L F Diehl1, L H Karnell, H R Menck. 1. Hematology-Oncology Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The natural history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is changing, although the reasons (potential changes in the disease's biology or in patterns in patient characteristics, treatment, or referral) are unclear. METHODS: This report uses National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) data, which reflect a hospital-based patient population from a broad spectrum of hospitals in the United States. Age, gender, race/ethnicity, income, treatment, overall survival, and relative survival were evaluated according to time period (1985-1990 and 1991-1995). Comparisons were made with U. S. population figures for 1990 and with series published over the last 70 years. RESULTS: CLL comprised 22.6% of the 108,396 cases of leukemia in the data base. The risk of developing CLL increased progressively with age and did not plateau; the average age was 69.6 years. At the time of initial diagnosis, 60.5% of patients received no treatment (this proportion increased from 58.1% to 62.7% between the 2 time periods). Overall survival was 48.2% at 5 years and 22.5% at 10 years. The 5-year relative survival was 69.5%, 72.2%, 63.1%, and 41.7% for age groups <40, 40-59, 60-79, and 80+ years, respectively; these rates indicated that CLL, and not comorbid disease, caused the greatest percentage of deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing CLL increases progressively with age without plateauing and is 2.8 times higher for older men than for older women. There is an increasing trend toward no treatment at the time of initial diagnosis. Long term overall survival of CLL patients is poor. CLL is a more fatal disease among older individuals because of the disease itself, not because of comorbid conditions. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: The natural history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is changing, although the reasons (potential changes in the disease's biology or in patterns in patient characteristics, treatment, or referral) are unclear. METHODS: This report uses National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) data, which reflect a hospital-based patient population from a broad spectrum of hospitals in the United States. Age, gender, race/ethnicity, income, treatment, overall survival, and relative survival were evaluated according to time period (1985-1990 and 1991-1995). Comparisons were made with U. S. population figures for 1990 and with series published over the last 70 years. RESULTS: CLL comprised 22.6% of the 108,396 cases of leukemia in the data base. The risk of developing CLL increased progressively with age and did not plateau; the average age was 69.6 years. At the time of initial diagnosis, 60.5% of patients received no treatment (this proportion increased from 58.1% to 62.7% between the 2 time periods). Overall survival was 48.2% at 5 years and 22.5% at 10 years. The 5-year relative survival was 69.5%, 72.2%, 63.1%, and 41.7% for age groups <40, 40-59, 60-79, and 80+ years, respectively; these rates indicated that CLL, and not comorbid disease, caused the greatest percentage of deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing CLL increases progressively with age without plateauing and is 2.8 times higher for older men than for older women. There is an increasing trend toward no treatment at the time of initial diagnosis. Long term overall survival of CLL patients is poor. CLL is a more fatal disease among older individuals because of the disease itself, not because of comorbid conditions. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Juhi Ojha; Jackline Ayres; Charla Secreto; Renee Tschumper; Kari Rabe; Daniel Van Dyke; Susan Slager; Tait Shanafelt; Rafael Fonseca; Neil E Kay; Esteban Braggio Journal: Blood Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Sarah E M Herman; Amber L Gordon; Amy J Wagner; Nyla A Heerema; Weiqiang Zhao; Joseph M Flynn; Jeffrey Jones; Leslie Andritsos; Kamal D Puri; Brian J Lannutti; Neill A Giese; Xiaoli Zhang; Lai Wei; John C Byrd; Amy J Johnson Journal: Blood Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Kari G Rabe; Neil E Kay; Clive S Zent; Diane F Jelinek; Megan S Reinalda; Susan M Schwager; Debbie A Bowen; Susan L Slager; Curtis A Hanson; Timothy G Call Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: John G Gribben; David Zahrieh; Katherine Stephans; Lini Bartlett-Pandite; Edwin P Alyea; David C Fisher; Arnold S Freedman; Peter Mauch; Robert Schlossman; Lecia V Sequist; Robert J Soiffer; Blossom Marshall; Donna Neuberg; Jerome Ritz; Lee M Nadler Journal: Blood Date: 2005-08-30 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jennifer A Woyach; Amy S Ruppert; Kanti Rai; Thomas S Lin; Susan Geyer; Jonathan Kolitz; Frederick R Appelbaum; Martin S Tallman; Andrew R Belch; Vicki A Morrison; Richard A Larson; John C Byrd Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-12-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Greg Jenkins; Timothy G Call; Clive S Zent; Susan Slager; Deborah A Bowen; Susan Schwager; Curtis A Hanson; Diane F Jelinek; Neil E Kay Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860