Literature DB >> 10594772

An optical sectioning programmable array microscope implemented with a digital micromirror device.

Q S Hanley1, P J Verveer, M J Gemkow, D Arndt-Jovin, T M Jovin.   

Abstract

The defining feature of a programmable array microscope (PAM) is the presence of a spatial light modulator in the image plane. A spatial light modulator used singly or as a matched pair for both illumination and detection can be used to generate an optical section. Under most conditions, the basic optical properties of an optically sectioning PAM are similar to those of rotating Nipkow discs. The method of pattern generation, however, is fundamentally different and allows arbitrary illumination patterns to be generated under programmable control, and sectioning strategies to be changed rapidly in response to specific experimental conditions. We report the features of a PAM incorporating a digital micromirror device, including the axial sectioning response to fluorescent thin films and the imaging of biological specimens. Three axial sectioning strategies were compared: line scans, dot lattice scans and pseudo-random sequence scans. The three strategies varied widely in light throughput, sectioning strength and robustness when used on real biological samples. The axial response to thin fluorescent films demonstrated a consistent decrease in the full width at half maximum (FWHM), accompanied by an increase in offset, as the unit cells defining the patterns grew smaller. Experimental axial response curves represent the sum of the response from a given point of illumination and cross-talk from neighbouring points. Cross-talk is minimized in the plane of best focus and when measured together with the single point response produces a decrease in FWHM. In patterns having constant throughput, there appears to be tradeoff between the FWHM and the size of the offset. The PAM was compared to a confocal laser scanning microscope using biological samples. The PAM demonstrated higher signal levels and dynamic range despite a shorter acquisition time. It also revealed more structures in x-z sections and less intensity drop-off with scanning depth.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10594772     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.1999.00602.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microsc        ISSN: 0022-2720            Impact factor:   1.758


  16 in total

1.  Computational adaptive optics for live three-dimensional biological imaging.

Authors:  Z Kam; B Hanser; M G Gustafsson; D A Agard; J W Sedat
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Image-adaptive deconvolution for three-dimensional deep biological imaging.

Authors:  Jacques Boutet de Monvel; Eric Scarfone; Sophie Le Calvez; Mats Ulfendahl
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Optical sectioning microscopy with planar or structured illumination.

Authors:  Jerome Mertz
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Adaptive illumination reduces photobleaching in structured illumination microscopy.

Authors:  Nadya Chakrova; Alicia Soler Canton; Christophe Danelon; Sjoerd Stallinga; Bernd Rieger
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  High speed adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy with an anamorphic point spread function.

Authors:  Jing Lu; Boyu Gu; Xiaolin Wang; Yuhua Zhang
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 6.  Single cell optical imaging and spectroscopy.

Authors:  Anthony S Stender; Kyle Marchuk; Chang Liu; Suzanne Sander; Matthew W Meyer; Emily A Smith; Bhanu Neupane; Gufeng Wang; Junjie Li; Ji-Xin Cheng; Bo Huang; Ning Fang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Angular light modulator using optical blinds.

Authors:  Zichao Bian; Soliman Alhudaithy; Zhe Wang; Zibang Zhang; Kaikai Guo; Liheng Bian; Yuji Tomizawa; Peter Satonick; Kazunori Hoshino; Guoan Zheng
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Random-access optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy using a digital micromirror device.

Authors:  Jinyang Liang; Yong Zhou; Amy W Winkler; Lidai Wang; Konstantin I Maslov; Chiye Li; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.776

9.  Temporal pixel multiplexing for simultaneous high-speed, high-resolution imaging.

Authors:  Gil Bub; Matthias Tecza; Michiel Helmes; Peter Lee; Peter Kohl
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching and photoconversion in multiple arbitrary regions of interest using a programmable array microscope.

Authors:  Guy M Hagen; Wouter Caarls; Keith A Lidke; Anthony H B De Vries; Cornelia Fritsch; B George Barisas; Donna J Arndt-Jovin; Thomas M Jovin
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.769

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.