Literature DB >> 10594471

Entry-into-human study with the novel immunosuppressant SDZ RAD in stable renal transplant recipients.

H H Neumayer1, K Paradis, A Korn, C Jean, L Fritsche, K Budde, M Winkler, V Kliem, R Pichlmayr, I A Hauser, K Burkhardt, A E Lison, I Barndt, S Appel-Dingemanse.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the tolerability of single oral SDZ RAD doses in stable renal transplant recipients and the pharmacokinetics of ascending SDZ RAD doses when coadministered with steady-state cyclosporin A microemulsion (Neoral).
METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential study involved 54 patients in six treatment groups; a different SDZ RAD dose (0.25, 0. 75, 2.5, 7.5, 15, 25 mg) was assessed in each group. Patients received a single oral dose of SDZ RAD (n=6) or placebo (n=3) with their usual Neoral dose. SDZ RAD and cyclosporin A pharmacokinetic parameters were determined.
RESULTS: All SDZ RAD doses were well tolerated, with no discontinuations due to adverse events, serious adverse events, or deaths. Similar proportions of patients receiving SDZ RAD and placebo had at least one adverse event (44% and 50%, respectively). Mean changes in laboratory variables (baseline to endpoint) showed no clinically meaningful differences between SDZ RAD and placebo groups. SDZ RAD was absorbed rapidly and showed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics (dose: 2.5-25 mg), based on systemic exposure. Multiple postabsorptive phases in the pharmacokinetic profile indicate tissue distribution. The elimination half-life ranged from 24 to 35 h across the five highest dose groups. Pharmacokinetics were similar in men and women. Co-administration of escalating single oral SDZ RAD doses did not affect steady-state cyclosporin A pharmacokinetics.
CONCLUSIONS: SDZ RAD was well tolerated; safety profiles of SDZ RAD and placebo were similar. SDZ RAD pharmacokinetics were dose-proportional across the range 2.5-25 mg in conjunction with cyclosporin A-based therapy, according to systemic exposure. Cyclosporin A pharmacokinetics were not affected by coadministration of single oral doses of 0.25-25 mg SDZ RAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10594471      PMCID: PMC2014362          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00085.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  7 in total

1.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

2.  SDZ RAD, a new rapamycin derivative: synergism with cyclosporine.

Authors:  H J Schuurman; S Cottens; S Fuchs; J Joergensen; T Meerloo; R Sedrani; M Tanner; G Zenke; W Schuler
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  The side effect profile of sirolimus: a phase I study in quiescent cyclosporine-prednisone-treated renal transplant patients.

Authors:  M G Murgia; S Jordan; B D Kahan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 4.  Rapamycin: distribution, pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic range investigations.

Authors:  R W Yatscoff; P Wang; K Chan; D Hicks; J Zimmerman
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.681

5.  SDZ RAD, a new rapamycin derivative: pharmacological properties in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  W Schuler; R Sedrani; S Cottens; B Häberlin; M Schulz; H J Schuurman; G Zenke; H G Zerwes; M H Schreier
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Kinetics and dynamics of single oral doses of sirolimus in sixteen renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  C Brattström; J Säwe; G Tydén; G Herlenius; K Claesson; J Zimmerman; C G Groth
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.681

7.  Reversal of ongoing heart, kidney, and pancreas allograft rejection and suppression of accelerated heart allograft rejection in the rat by rapamycin.

Authors:  H Chen; J Wu; D Xu; H Luo; P M Daloze
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.939

  7 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Calcineurin inhibitors and post-transplant hyperlipidaemias.

Authors:  R Moore; D Hernandez; H Valantine
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Rapid estimation of whole blood everolimus concentrations using architect sirolimus immunoassay and mathematical equations: comparison with everolimus values determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Amitava Dasgupta; Vanessa Moreno; Shawn Balark; Andre Smith; Marilyn Sonilal; Neelam Tejpal; Charles T Van Buren
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 3.  Everolimus: a review of its use in renal and cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Christopher Dunn; Katherine F Croom
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Everolimus.

Authors:  Therese M Chapman; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of everolimus.

Authors:  Gabriele I Kirchner; Ivo Meier-Wiedenbach; Michael P Manns
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  New perspectives on mTOR inhibitors (rapamycin, rapalogs and TORKinibs) in transplantation.

Authors:  Matthias Waldner; Daniel Fantus; Mario Solari; Angus W Thomson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-06       Impact factor: 4.335

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.