Literature DB >> 10593775

Comparison of oxygen therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure on Cheyne-Stokes respiration during sleep in congestive heart failure.

S L Krachman1, G E D'Alonzo, T J Berger, H J Eisen.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Both oxygen therapy and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy have independently been shown to be effective in the treatment of Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term effects of oxygen therapy and nasal CPAP therapy on CSR in a group of stable patients with severe CHF.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-five stable patients (mean [+/- SD] age, 56 +/- 9) with CHF and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 17 +/- 0.8%. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: All patients had a right heart catheterization prior to the study and an echocardiogram performed to measure LVEF. In addition, all patients had an initial sleep study to identify the presence of CSR. Sleep studies included continuous recordings of breathing pattern, pulse oximetry, and EEG. Those patients identified as having CSR were randomized to a night on oxygen therapy (2 L/min by nasal cannula) and another night on nasal CPAP therapy (9 +/- 0.3 cm H(2)O).
RESULTS: Fourteen of the 25 patients (56%) studied had CSR (apnea hypopnea index [AHI], 36 +/- 7 events per hour) during their initial sleep study. Nine of the 14 patients with CSR completed the study. When compared with baseline measurements, both oxygen therapy and nasal CPAP therapy significantly decreased the AHI (from 44 +/- 9 to 18 +/- 5 and 15 +/- 8 events per hour, respectively; p < 0.05), with no significant difference between the two modalities. The mean oxygen saturation increased significantly and to a similar extent with oxygen therapy and nasal CPAP therapy (from 93 +/- 0.7% to 96 +/- 0.8% and 95 +/- 0. 7%, respectively; p < 0.05), as did the lowest oxygen saturation during the night (from 80 +/- 2% to 85 +/- 3% and 88 +/- 2%, respectively; p < 0.05). In addition, the mean percent time the oxygen saturation was < 90% also improved with both interventions (from a baseline of 17 +/- 5 to 6 +/- 3% with oxygen therapy and 5 +/- 2% with nasal CPAP therapy; p < 0.05). When compared with baseline measurements, the apnea-hypopnea length, cycle length, circulation time, and heart rate did not significantly change with either oxygen therapy or nasal CPAP therapy. Total sleep time and sleep efficiency decreased only with nasal CPAP therapy (from 324 +/- 20 to 257 +/- 14 min, and from 82 +/- 3 to 72 +/- 2%, respectively; p < 0.05). The arousal index, when compared with baseline, remained unchanged with both oxygen therapy and nasal CPAP therapy.
CONCLUSION: CSR occurs frequently in stable patients with severe CHF. In addition, oxygen therapy and nasal CPAP therapy are equally effective in decreasing the AHI in those CHF patients with CSR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10593775     DOI: 10.1378/chest.116.6.1550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  24 in total

Review 1.  Sleep in congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Bhavneesh Sharma; Robert Owens; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.456

Review 2.  Sleep.7: positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome.

Authors:  P Gordon; M H Sanders
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Heart failure, central sleep apnea, CPAP, and arousals: another piece of the puzzle.

Authors:  Kenneth R Casey
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 4.  Central sleep apnoea-a clinical review.

Authors:  Rexford T Muza
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  The treatment of central sleep apnea syndromes in adults: practice parameters with an evidence-based literature review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  R Nisha Aurora; Susmita Chowdhuri; Kannan Ramar; Sabin R Bista; Kenneth R Casey; Carin I Lamm; David A Kristo; Jorge M Mallea; James A Rowley; Rochelle S Zak; Sharon L Tracy
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 6.  Central sleep apnoea syndrome in patients with chronic heart disease: a critical review of the current literature.

Authors:  T Köhnlein; T Welte; L B Tan; M W Elliott
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Treatment of central sleep apnea in U.S. veterans.

Authors:  Susmita Chowdhuri; Ahmed Ghabsha; Prabhat Sinha; Medina Kadri; Simranjit Narula; M Safwan Badr
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on sleep structure in heart failure patients with central sleep apnea.

Authors:  Pimon Ruttanaumpawan; Alexander G Logan; John S Floras; T Douglas Bradley
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 9.  Central sleep apnea: implications for congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Arturo Garcia-Touchard; Virend K Somers; Lyle J Olson; Sean M Caples
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 10.  Non-cardiac comorbidities in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Chim C Lang; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.