Literature DB >> 10593395

A simplified and efficient method for obtaining metaphase chromosomes from individual human blastomeres.

Y Verlinsky1, S Evsikov.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a reliable and cost-effective technique for karyotyping single human blastomeres for preimplantation diagnosis of chromosomal translocations.
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
SETTING: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and IVF program, Reproductive Genetics Institute/IVF Illinois, Chicago, Illinois. PATIENT(S): Patients undergoing IVF and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. INTERVENTION(S): Individual human blastomeres were fused with enucleated or intact mouse zygotes. After blastomere-cytoplast fusion, heterokaryons were fixed at metaphase of the first cleavage division or treated with okadaic acid to induce premature chromosome condensation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Percentage of analyzable metaphase plates and ease and reliability of the procedure. RESULT(S): The effectiveness of the proposed technique with blastomeres from day 3 diploid embryos was 91%. Sixty-three metaphases were obtained from 69 blastomeres; 3 blastomeres had not fused, 1 heterokaryon had no chromatin (an anucleated cytoplasmic bleb was biopsied and fused), and 2 heterokaryons cleaved before they were fixed. CONCLUSION(S): Human blastomere fusion with an intact mouse zygote is an efficient and technically undemanding method for obtaining metaphase chromosome plates from individual human blastomeres for preimplantation testing for chromosomal translocations and aneuploidy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10593395     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00394-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  2 in total

Review 1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: present and future.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  In vitro fertilization outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements comparing fluorescence in-situ hybridization, microarray comparative genomic hybridization, and next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Chantal B Bartels; Reeva Makhijani; Prachi Godiwala; Alison Bartolucci; John C Nulsen; Daniel R Grow; Lawrence Engmann; Claudio A Benadiva
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.