OBJECTIVE: To compare an ovarian stimulation protocol using microdose follicular phase GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) and oral contraceptive (OC) pills to a luteal phase GnRH-a protocol. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING:University affiliated IVF program. PATIENT(S): One hundred seventy patients who underwent IVF and ET in 1996. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were assigned to either a midluteal start of leuprolide acetate (LA) 1 mg/d, reduced to 0.5 mg/d after addition of gonadotropins (LUT), or OC pills until cycle day 0 followed by 20 microg of LA every 12 hours on cycle day 3 with addition of gonadotropins on cycle day 5 (MICRO). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of FSH ampules, days of stimulation, peak E2, and number of oocytes retrieved. RESULT(S): There were no statistically significant differences in the main outcome measures between the two groups using an age-matched ANOVA. Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle start was not statistically different (LUT = 54%, and MICRO = 37%). The cancellation rate was significantly higher in the MICRO group (22.5% vs. 8.2%). CONCLUSION(S): Given the higher cancellation rate in the microdose group, a randomized clinical trial is required to determine the possible benefit of a lower dose of GnRH-a in patients with normal ovarian function.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare an ovarian stimulation protocol using microdose follicular phase GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) and oral contraceptive (OC) pills to a luteal phase GnRH-a protocol. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University affiliated IVF program. PATIENT(S): One hundred seventy patients who underwent IVF and ET in 1996. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were assigned to either a midluteal start of leuprolide acetate (LA) 1 mg/d, reduced to 0.5 mg/d after addition of gonadotropins (LUT), or OC pills until cycle day 0 followed by 20 microg of LA every 12 hours on cycle day 3 with addition of gonadotropins on cycle day 5 (MICRO). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of FSH ampules, days of stimulation, peak E2, and number of oocytes retrieved. RESULT(S): There were no statistically significant differences in the main outcome measures between the two groups using an age-matched ANOVA. Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle start was not statistically different (LUT = 54%, and MICRO = 37%). The cancellation rate was significantly higher in the MICRO group (22.5% vs. 8.2%). CONCLUSION(S): Given the higher cancellation rate in the microdose group, a randomized clinical trial is required to determine the possible benefit of a lower dose of GnRH-a in patients with normal ovarian function.
Authors: Kara N Goldman; Kimberly S Moon; Belinda J Yauger; Mark D Payson; James H Segars; Barbara J Stegmann Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2011-03-31 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Ryan J Heitmann; Micah J Hill; Aidita N James; Tim Schimmel; James H Segars; John M Csokmay; Jacques Cohen; Mark D Payson Journal: Reprod Biomed Online Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 3.828
Authors: Adrienne B Neithardt; James H Segars; Sasha Hennessy; Aidita N James; Jeffrey L McKeeby Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Melinda B Henne; Barbara J Stegmann; Adrienne B Neithardt; William H Catherino; Alicia Y Armstrong; Tzu-Cheg Kao; James H Segars Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2007-07-31 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Eric D Levens; Brian W Whitcomb; Jonathan D Kort; Donna Materia-Hoover; Frederick W Larsen Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2008-02-04 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Gayem İnayet Turgay Çelik; Havva Kömür Sütçü; Yaşam Kemal Akpak; Münire Erman Akar Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 3.411