INTRODUCTION: The frontal and occipital horn ration (FOR) has recently been described as a simple, linear measurement of ventricular size that correlates very well with ventricular volume. This study further characterizes the measurement properties of the FOR by investigating its interobserver reliability and comparing it to a subjective assessment of ventricular size. METHODS: Axial images (CT and MR) of children with hydrocephalus taken before and after third ventriculostomy were reviewed by 4 independent observers. Two observers were blinded to patient identity and clinical status and 2 observers were nonblinded. Each observer independently recorded linear measurements from which the FOR was calculated for each image. Each reviewer also made a separate subjective assessment of the degree of hydrocephalus on a 9-point adjectival scale. Reliability was calculated using a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with random image and observer effects. RESULTS: There were 120 separate observations (4 observers, 30 images). The FOR ranged from 0.33 to 0.75 (mean 0.55, standard deviation 0.11). The reliability coefficient was 0.93 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.80-0.97) between the 2 blinded observers and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99) between the 2 nonblinded observer. The overall interobserver reliability for all 4 observers was 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.98). The mean FOR for each observer was very similar, regardless of the observer's blinding status. However, the reliability of the observers' subjective assessment of the hydrocephalus was much lower (ICC = 0.77, 95% CI 0. 60-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The FOR demonstrates excellent interobserver reliability (>0.9) and was superior to subjective assessments of hydrocephalus. In this study, excellent reliability was maintained regardless of the blinding status of the observers. This further demonstrates the properties of the FOR as a simple and reproducible measure of ventricular size. It is suitable for use in clinical studies, possibly even in situations in which observer blinding is not possible. Copyright 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel
INTRODUCTION: The frontal and occipital horn ration (FOR) has recently been described as a simple, linear measurement of ventricular size that correlates very well with ventricular volume. This study further characterizes the measurement properties of the FOR by investigating its interobserver reliability and comparing it to a subjective assessment of ventricular size. METHODS: Axial images (CT and MR) of children with hydrocephalus taken before and after third ventriculostomy were reviewed by 4 independent observers. Two observers were blinded to patient identity and clinical status and 2 observers were nonblinded. Each observer independently recorded linear measurements from which the FOR was calculated for each image. Each reviewer also made a separate subjective assessment of the degree of hydrocephalus on a 9-point adjectival scale. Reliability was calculated using a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with random image and observer effects. RESULTS: There were 120 separate observations (4 observers, 30 images). The FOR ranged from 0.33 to 0.75 (mean 0.55, standard deviation 0.11). The reliability coefficient was 0.93 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.80-0.97) between the 2 blinded observers and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99) between the 2 nonblinded observer. The overall interobserver reliability for all 4 observers was 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.98). The mean FOR for each observer was very similar, regardless of the observer's blinding status. However, the reliability of the observers' subjective assessment of the hydrocephalus was much lower (ICC = 0.77, 95% CI 0. 60-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The FOR demonstrates excellent interobserver reliability (>0.9) and was superior to subjective assessments of hydrocephalus. In this study, excellent reliability was maintained regardless of the blinding status of the observers. This further demonstrates the properties of the FOR as a simple and reproducible measure of ventricular size. It is suitable for use in clinical studies, possibly even in situations in which observer blinding is not possible. Copyright 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel
Authors: Clinton D Morgan; Michael S Wolf; Truc M Le; Chevis N Shannon; John C Wellons; Bret A Mettler Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 1.475