Literature DB >> 10591906

Parieto-frontal coding of reaching: an integrated framework.

Y Burnod1, P Baraduc, A Battaglia-Mayer, E Guigon, E Koechlin, S Ferraina, F Lacquaniti, R Caminiti.   

Abstract

In the last few years, anatomical and physiological studies have provided new insights into the organization of the parieto-frontal network underlying visually guided arm-reaching movements in at least three domains. (1) Network architecture. It has been shown that the different classes of neurons encoding information relevant to reaching are not confined within individual cortical areas, but are common to different areas, which are generally linked by reciprocal association connections. (2) Representation of information. There is evidence suggesting that reach-related populations of neurons do not encode relevant parameters within pure sensory or motor "reference frames", but rather combine them within hybrid dimensions. (3) Visuomotor transformation. It has been proposed that the computation of motor commands for reaching occurs as a simultaneous recruitment of discrete populations of neurons sharing similar properties in different cortical areas, rather than as a serial process from vision to movement, engaging different areas at different times. The goal of this paper was to link experimental (neurophysiological and neuroanatomical) and computational aspects within an integrated framework to illustrate how different neuronal populations in the parieto-frontal network operate a collective and distributed computation for reaching. In this framework, all dynamic (tuning, combinatorial, computational) properties of units are determined by their location relative to three main functional axes of the network, the visual-to-somatic, position-direction, and sensory-motor axis. The visual-to-somatic axis is defined by gradients of activity symmetrical to the central sulcus and distributed over both frontal and parietal cortices. At least four sets of reach-related signals (retinal, gaze, arm position/movement direction, muscle output) are represented along this axis. This architecture defines informational domains where neurons combine different inputs. The position-direction axis is identified by the regular distribution of information over large populations of neurons processing both positional and directional signals (concerning the arm, gaze, visual stimuli, etc.) Therefore, the activity of gaze- and arm-related neurons can represent virtual three-dimensional (3D) pathways for gaze shifts or hand movement. Virtual 3D pathways are thus defined by a combination of directional and positional information. The sensory-motor axis is defined by neurons displaying different temporal relationships with the different reach-related signals, such as target presentation, preparation for intended arm movement, onset of movements, etc. These properties reflect the computation performed by local networks, which are formed by two types of processing units: matching and condition units. Matching units relate different neural representations of virtual 3D pathways for gaze or hand, and can predict motor commands and their sensory consequences. Depending on the units involved, different matching operations can be learned in the network, resulting in the acquisition of different visuo-motor transformations, such as those underlying reaching to foveated targets, reaching to extrafoveal targets, and visual tracking of hand movement trajectory. Condition units link these matching operations to reinforcement contingencies and therefore can shape the collective neural recruitment along the three axes of the network. This will result in a progressive match of retinal, gaze, arm, and muscle signals suitable for moving the hand toward the target.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10591906     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  53 in total

1.  Differential involvement of parietal and precentral regions in movement preparation and motor intention.

Authors:  Daniel Thoenissen; Karl Zilles; Ivan Toni
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?

Authors:  Cheryl M Glazebrook; Victoria P Dhillon; Katherine M Keetch; James Lyons; Eric Amazeen; Daniel J Weeks; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural representation during visually guided reaching in macaque posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Barbara Heider; Anushree Karnik; Nirmala Ramalingam; Ralph M Siegel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Electroencephalographic reactivity to unimodal and bimodal visual and proprioceptive demands in sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  J C Mizelle; Larry Forrester; Mark Hallett; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Neural substrates of graphomotor sequence learning: a combined FMRI and kinematic study.

Authors:  Bruce A Swett; Jose L Contreras-Vidal; Rasmus Birn; Allen Braun
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Reorganization of finger coordination patterns during adaptation to rotation and scaling of a newly learned sensorimotor transformation.

Authors:  Xiaolin Liu; Kristine M Mosier; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Posterior parietal negativity preceding self-paced praxis movements.

Authors:  Lewis A Wheaton; Satoshi Yakota; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Spatial interference during bimanual coordination: differential brain networks associated with control of movement amplitude and direction.

Authors:  Nicole Wenderoth; Filiep Debaere; Stefan Sunaert; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  The importance of being agranular: a comparative account of visual and motor cortex.

Authors:  Stewart Shipp
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Neurophysiology of prehension. I. Posterior parietal cortex and object-oriented hand behaviors.

Authors:  Esther P Gardner; K Srinivasa Babu; Shari D Reitzen; Soumya Ghosh; Alice S Brown; Jessie Chen; Anastasia L Hall; Michael D Herzlinger; Jane B Kohlenstein; Jin Y Ro
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.