PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the authors' surgical approach and technique in patients with congenital rectovestibular fistula with a normal anus (CRF). METHODS: During the period between 1981 and 1995, 19 girls from 2 months to 13 years of age were treated surgically for CRF by a primary perineal approach. After appropriate bowel preparation, the patient was placed in a lithotomy position. A probing catheter was placed in the fistula. A perineal transverse skin incision was made on the midpoint between the posterior commissure and the anus, and the underlying tissue was dissected. The fistula was divided, and the both ends were closed by interrupted sutures. The external sphincter muscle was mobilized to interpose between the vestibular and rectal stumps of the fistula. Postoperative feeding was begun on day 6. RESULTS: A protecting colostomy was created in the early 4 patients. Fifteen patients underwent a primary fistula division without colostomy. In those without colostomy, 1 patient had a reopening of the fistula 6 days after the primary repair. In this patient, colostomy was created, and the fistula was divided 6 months later by the same approach. After a follow-up of 3 to 17 years, all patients have normal bowel habit. CONCLUSION: A primary perineal approach is appropriate for the treatment of CRF.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the authors' surgical approach and technique in patients with congenital rectovestibular fistula with a normal anus (CRF). METHODS: During the period between 1981 and 1995, 19 girls from 2 months to 13 years of age were treated surgically for CRF by a primary perineal approach. After appropriate bowel preparation, the patient was placed in a lithotomy position. A probing catheter was placed in the fistula. A perineal transverse skin incision was made on the midpoint between the posterior commissure and the anus, and the underlying tissue was dissected. The fistula was divided, and the both ends were closed by interrupted sutures. The external sphincter muscle was mobilized to interpose between the vestibular and rectal stumps of the fistula. Postoperative feeding was begun on day 6. RESULTS: A protecting colostomy was created in the early 4 patients. Fifteen patients underwent a primary fistula division without colostomy. In those without colostomy, 1 patient had a reopening of the fistula 6 days after the primary repair. In this patient, colostomy was created, and the fistula was divided 6 months later by the same approach. After a follow-up of 3 to 17 years, all patients have normal bowel habit. CONCLUSION: A primary perineal approach is appropriate for the treatment of CRF.