Literature DB >> 10591095

Efficacy and selectivity in flexible database docking.

R M Knegtel1, M Wagener.   

Abstract

Flexible database docking with DOCK 4.0 has been evaluated for its ability to retrieve biologically active molecules from a database of approximately 1,000 compounds with known activities against thrombin and the progesterone receptor. The retrieval of known actives and chemically similar but inactive molecules was monitored as a function of conformational and orientational sampling. The largest enrichment of actives among the 10% highest ranking molecules is obtained when only five conformations are used to seed the next round of ligand reconstruction and limited sampling is applied to place the base fragment in the binding site. The performance of energy and chemical scoring, as implemented in DOCK 4.0, was found to depend on the protein used for docking. For the progesterone receptor, energy scoring yields the largest enrichments (64%) in terms of actives retrieved among the 10% top scoring molecules, while chemical scoring performs best for thrombin (94%). With the exception of the application of energy scoring to the progesterone receptor, both energy-based scoring schemes applied in this study do not discriminate well between true actives and chemically similar but inactive compounds. In conclusion, flexible docking is able to effectively prioritize high-throughput screening databases, using less conformational sampling than normally required for appropriate reconstruction of protein-ligand complexes. The more subtle discrimination between chemically similar classes of active and inactive compounds remains, however, problematic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10591095     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19991115)37:3<334::aid-prot3>3.0.co;2-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  12 in total

1.  Q-fit: a probabilistic method for docking molecular fragments by sampling low energy conformational space.

Authors:  Richard M Jackson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Identifying the binding mode of a molecular scaffold.

Authors:  Doron Chema; Doron Eren; Avner Yayon; Amiram Goldblum; Andrea Zaliani
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Unsupervised guided docking of covalently bound ligands.

Authors:  Xavier Fradera; Jasmit Kaur; Jordi Mestres
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  In-silico screening using flexible ligand binding pockets: a molecular dynamics-based approach.

Authors:  Dakshanamurthy Sivanesan; Rajendram V Rajnarayanan; Jason Doherty; Nagarajan Pattabiraman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Correlation Between Molecular Modelling and Spectroscopic Techniques in Investigation With DNA Binding Interaction of Ruthenium(II) Complexes.

Authors:  B Thulasiram; C Shobha Devi; Yata Praveen Kumar; Rajeshwar Rao Aerva; S Satyanarayana; Penumaka Nagababu
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Interactions of peptide mimics of hyaluronic acid with the receptor for hyaluronan mediated motility (RHAMM).

Authors:  Michael R Ziebell; Glenn D Prestwich
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Characterization of small molecule binding. I. Accurate identification of strong inhibitors in virtual screening.

Authors:  Bo Ding; Jian Wang; Nan Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  An effective docking strategy for virtual screening based on multi-objective optimization algorithm.

Authors:  Honglin Li; Hailei Zhang; Mingyue Zheng; Jie Luo; Ling Kang; Xiaofeng Liu; Xicheng Wang; Hualiang Jiang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Distilling the essential features of a protein surface for improving protein-ligand docking, scoring, and virtual screening.

Authors:  Maria I Zavodszky; Paul C Sanschagrin; Rajesh S Korde; Leslie A Kuhn
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Ligand scaffold hopping combining 3D maximal substructure search and molecular similarity.

Authors:  Flavien Quintus; Olivier Sperandio; Julien Grynberg; Michel Petitjean; Pierre Tuffery
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.