BACKGROUND: Cytarabine is an essential drug for inducing remission of acute myelogenous leukemia, and it is also one the most effective drugs used as salvage therapy for patients with all types of relapsed acute leukemia. Nevertheless, there is considerable room for improvement in the treatment of patients with relapsed leukemia in terms of both the reinduction rate and the duration of response. Fludarabine has been shown to augment responses to cytarabine, possibly by increasing the intracellular concentrations of the active metabolite cytarabine triphosphate. Higher-than-standard doses of mitoxantrone have been shown to augment responses to cytarabine, possibly by increasing the DNA strand breaks induced by topoisomerase II; these strand breaks cannot be effectively repaired in the presence of cytarabine triphosphate. This preliminary study was designed to determine whether moderately high doses of mitoxantrone could be added to the combination of fludarabine and cytarabine in an attempt to improve the combination's antileukemic efficacy. METHODS: Fifty-five adults with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia or the blastic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) received salvage therapy with the FLAM regimen, which consisted of fludarabine, cytarabine, and increasing doses of mitoxantrone. RESULTS: Even with doses of mitoxantrone escalated to as much as 60 mg/m(2) over 4 days, dose-limiting toxicity was not observed. Overall, the complete response rate was 27.3% (15 of 55 patients, including 4 of 17 with acute myelogenous leukemia [AML], 4 of 12 with acute lymphocytic leukemia [ALL], and 7 of 26 with the blastic phase of CML). The median time to complete response was 42 days. Toxicity other than myelosuppression was manifested primarily as hyperbilirubinemia, which was reversible in all cases. Poor performance status and undifferentiated blastic phase of CML were poor prognostic factors for response to FLAM. CONCLUSIONS: The FLAM regimen is an active salvage regimen and should be formally evaluated in Phase II studies of patients with AML, ALL, and the myeloid and lymphoid blastic phases of CML. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND:Cytarabine is an essential drug for inducing remission of acute myelogenous leukemia, and it is also one the most effective drugs used as salvage therapy for patients with all types of relapsed acute leukemia. Nevertheless, there is considerable room for improvement in the treatment of patients with relapsed leukemia in terms of both the reinduction rate and the duration of response. Fludarabine has been shown to augment responses to cytarabine, possibly by increasing the intracellular concentrations of the active metabolite cytarabine triphosphate. Higher-than-standard doses of mitoxantrone have been shown to augment responses to cytarabine, possibly by increasing the DNA strand breaks induced by topoisomerase II; these strand breaks cannot be effectively repaired in the presence of cytarabine triphosphate. This preliminary study was designed to determine whether moderately high doses of mitoxantrone could be added to the combination of fludarabine and cytarabine in an attempt to improve the combination's antileukemic efficacy. METHODS: Fifty-five adults with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia or the blastic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) received salvage therapy with the FLAM regimen, which consisted of fludarabine, cytarabine, and increasing doses of mitoxantrone. RESULTS: Even with doses of mitoxantrone escalated to as much as 60 mg/m(2) over 4 days, dose-limiting toxicity was not observed. Overall, the complete response rate was 27.3% (15 of 55 patients, including 4 of 17 with acute myelogenous leukemia [AML], 4 of 12 with acute lymphocytic leukemia [ALL], and 7 of 26 with the blastic phase of CML). The median time to complete response was 42 days. Toxicity other than myelosuppression was manifested primarily as hyperbilirubinemia, which was reversible in all cases. Poor performance status and undifferentiated blastic phase of CML were poor prognostic factors for response to FLAM. CONCLUSIONS: The FLAM regimen is an active salvage regimen and should be formally evaluated in Phase II studies of patients with AML, ALL, and the myeloid and lymphoid blastic phases of CML. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Nicholas J Short; Hagop Kantarjian; Farhad Ravandi; Xuelin Huang; Lianchun Xiao; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; William Plunkett; Varsha Gandhi; Koji Sasaki; Naveen Pemmaraju; Naval G Daver; Gautam Borthakur; Nitin Jain; Marina Konopleva; Zeev Estrov; Tapan M Kadia; William G Wierda; Courtney D DiNardo; Mark Brandt; Susan M O'Brien; Jorge E Cortes; Elias Jabbour Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2017-07-18