Literature DB >> 10589637

A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of 0.25% levobupivacaine combined with 0.005% morphine, 0.25% levobupivacaine alone, or 0.005% morphine alone for the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

J C Crews1, A H Hord, D D Denson, C Schatzman.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We compared the relative efficacy of the combination of the single-isomer local anesthetic levobupivacaine and the opioid analgesic morphine versus both drugs alone for postoperative epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgical procedures. Thoracic epidural anesthesia was produced and maintained with levobupivacaine 0.75% in combination with general inhaled anesthesia without opioids. Patients were randomized to one of three postoperative treatment groups: 1) a combination of levobupivacaine 0.25% and morphine 0.005%; 2) levobupivacaine 0.25%; or 3) morphine 0.005%. Postoperatively, all epidural infusions were commenced at a rate of 4 mL/h. Patients could receive a 4 mL-bolus dose and an increase in the epidural infusion rate by 2 mL/h on request for supplemental analgesia. Patients were also allowed ketorolac as a supplemental analgesic at any time after the first analgesic request. Patients in the combination group had longer times to request for supplemental analgesia as compared with the levobupivacaine only group (P < 0.05) and a trend toward longer time to request as compared with the morphine only group (P = 0.066). Patients in the combination group had lower visual analog scale pain scores at rest and activity at 4 and 8 h and fewer requests for supplemental ketorolac (P < 0.05). In conclusion, this study demonstrates a significant improvement in postoperative analgesic efficacy with the combination of levobupivacaine and morphine for continuous epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgical procedures. IMPLICATIONS: A significant improvement in postoperative analgesic efficacy is demonstrated with the thoracic epidural administration of the combination of the single-isomer local anesthetic levobupivacaine 0.25% and morphine 0.005% in patients after major abdominal surgical procedures as compared with either drug used alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10589637     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199912000-00035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Levobupivacaine for regional anesthesia. A systematic review].

Authors:  B Urbanek; S Kapral
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Levobupivacaine: a review of its pharmacology and use as a local anaesthetic.

Authors:  R H Foster; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Levobupivacaine.

Authors:  Chantal A A Heppolette; Derek Brunnen; Sohail Bampoe; Peter M Odor
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Mina Nishimori; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-16

5.  Comparison of the Effects of Epidural Levobupivacaine with Tramadol or Morphine Addition on Postoperative Analgesia following Major Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Zeynep Türkoğlu; Feride Karacaer; Ebru Biricik; Murat Ilgınel; Hakkı Ünlügenç
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2019-02-21

6.  Update on local anesthetics: focus on levobupivacaine.

Authors:  Crina L Burlacu; Donal J Buggy
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Clinical profile of levobupivacaine in regional anesthesia: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa; Jasleen Kaur
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.