Literature DB >> 10589609

A comparison of two techniques for cervical plexus blockade: evaluation of efficacy and systemic toxicity.

J C Merle1, J X Mazoit, P Desgranges, K Abhay, S Rezaiguia, G Dhonneur, P Duvaldestin.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We compared two techniques of cervical plexus blockade (CPB) for carotid endarterectomy. Cervical plexus nerve block was performed with a combination of bupivacaine and lidocaine, with injections at the C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5 transverse processes in 11 patients (classical CPB) or with a single injection after localization of the cervical plexus with a nerve stimulator in 12 patients (interscalene CPB). Pain scores were obtained during block placement and at predetermined phases of the operation. Arterial blood was sampled before and 3, 5, 8, 10, 15, 25, 40, and 60 min after CPB for measurement of bupivacaine and lidocaine concentrations. Interscalene CPB was less painful than classical CPB. The techniques appeared equally effective. Patients in both groups required equivalent supplementation with IV fentanyl and additional local infiltration with lidocaine during the most painful stages of surgery. The maximal concentration of bupivacaine was lower in interscalene CPB compared with classical CPB (1.0 microg/mL versus 1.5 microg/mL, P < 0.01). The time required to reach the maximal concentration of bupivacaine was 15 (10-40) min in interscalene CPB and 10 (5-17) min in classical CPB (P < 0.05). Lidocaine maximal concentration was similar in both groups, however the time required to reach the maximal concentration was longer (P < 0.05) in interscalene CPB (15 [10-60] min) than in classical CPB (10 [8-20] min). We conclude that the interscalene CPB is as effective as the classical CPB as a regional technique for carotid endarterectomy and may be associated with a lower systemic absorption of bupivacaine. IMPLICATIONS: Cervical plexus blockade for carotid endarterectomy can be effectively performed with a single injection after localization of the cervical plexus with a nerve stimulator. This technique is simple and was associated with less systemic absorption of local anesthetic than the multiple-injection technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10589609     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199912000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Anesthesia for carotid artery surgery. Is there a gold standard?].

Authors:  T Rössel; R J Litz; A R Heller; T Koch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Regional anesthesia for carotid surgery : An overview of anatomy, techniques and their clinical relevance].

Authors:  A Koköfer; J Nawratil; M Opperer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Bilateral guided cervical block for Zenker diverticulum excision in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Zoher M Naja; Mohamad A Al-Tannir; Ahed Zeidan; Mustafa Oweidat; Mariam El-Rajab; Fouad M Ziade; Anis S Baraka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Regional anaesthesia techniques for carotid surgery: the state of art.

Authors:  Alessandra Ciccozzi; Chiara Angeletti; Cristiana Guetti; Joseph Pergolizzi; Paolo Matteo Angeletti; Roberta Mariani; Franco Marinangeli
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-05-01

5.  Effects of regional anesthesia techniques on local anesthetic plasma levels and complications in carotid surgery: a randomized controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  Thomas Rössel; Christopher Uhlig; Jörg Pietsch; Stefan Ludwig; Thea Koch; Torsten Richter; Peter Markus Spieth; Stephan Kersting
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Cervical plexus block.

Authors:  Jin-Soo Kim; Justin Sangwook Ko; Seunguk Bang; Hyungtae Kim; Sook Young Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-07-04

7.  Ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block under dexmedetomidine sedation versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective pilot study.

Authors:  Wangseok Do; Ah-Reum Cho; Eun-Jung Kim; Hyae-Jin Kim; Eunsoo Kim; Heon-Jeong Lee
Journal:  Yeungnam Univ J Med       Date:  2018-06-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.