Literature DB >> 10589564

Pancreatitis complicated by gland necrosis: evolution of findings on contrast-enhanced CT.

K M Vitellas1, E K Paulson, R A Enns, M T Keogan, T N Pappas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to investigate the natural history of pancreatic necrosis on contrast-enhanced CT in patients managed nonoperatively.
METHOD: A computer-based radiology information search revealed 32 patients with pancreatic necrosis who had had serial contrast-enhanced CT scans and were managed nonoperatively. There were 23 men and 9 women with a mean age of 51 years. One hundred forty-five contrast-enhanced CT scans were retrospectively reviewed for the location and extent of necrosis. The medical records of all patients were reviewed.
RESULTS: The 32 patients had a mean Ranson clinical grade of 5.8 (range 3-8). Eighteen of these 32 patients were managed nonoperatively, and 14 patients required a necrosectomy after initial nonoperative management. In the 32 patients, the location of necrosis was in the head (3), body (6), tail (2), head/body (2), head/body/tail (9), body/tail (9), and head/tail (1). Extent of necrosis was 0-25% (9), 26-50% (6), 51-75% (6), and 76-100% (11). The extent of necrosis remained stable during follow-up in 22 (69%) patients and increased during follow-up in 10 (31%). Necrosectomy was performed in six (60%) patients in whom there was an increase in necrosis and eight (36%) patients in whom necrosis was stable. No patient had restoration of normal enhancement in an area that was previously necrotic. There were five patients who were managed nonoperatively (mean follow-up 318 days) in whom the necrosis eventually resorbed, forming a focal parenchymal cleft reminiscent of a scar. Five of the 32 patients died.
CONCLUSION: Pancreatic necrosis as demonstrated by CT tends to remain stable in most patients treated nonoperatively. If the extent of necrosis increases, patients are more likely to require a necrosectomy. In some patients managed nonoperatively, the pancreatic necrosis will resorb, resulting in a fat-replaced cleft reminiscent of a scar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10589564     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199911000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  5 in total

Review 1.  Acute pancreatitis at the beginning of the 21st century: the state of the art.

Authors:  Alfredo F Tonsi; Matilde Bacchion; Stefano Crippa; Giuseppe Malleo; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Planned staged reoperative necrosectomy using an abdominal zipper in the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis.

Authors:  Dejan V Radenkovic; Djordje D Bajec; Gregory G Tsiotos; Aleksandar R Karamarkovic; Natasa M Milic; Branislav D Stefanovic; Vesna Bumbasirevic; Palve M Gregoric; Dragan Masulovic; Miroslav M Milicevic
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  CT findings of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN): differentiation from pseudocyst and prediction of outcome after endoscopic therapy.

Authors:  Naoki Takahashi; Georgios I Papachristou; Grant D Schmit; Prabhleen Chahal; Andrew J LeRoy; Michael G Sarr; Santhi Swaroop Vege; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Todd H Baron
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Pancreatic fluid collections: What is the ideal imaging technique?

Authors:  Narendra Dhaka; Jayanta Samanta; Suman Kochhar; Navin Kalra; Sreekanth Appasani; Manish Manrai; Rakesh Kochhar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Radical subtotal pancreatic resection, including splenectomy, is an effective one-off treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  Justin Davies; Stevan G Stojkovic; David Duffy; David J Alexander
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.282

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.