Literature DB >> 10588304

In-vitro activity of HMR 3647 against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and beta-haemolytic streptococci.

M Wootton1, K E Bowker, A Janowska, H A Holt, A P MacGowan.   

Abstract

The in-vitro activity of HMR 3647 and seven comparators (azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin A, roxithromycin, penicillin G, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) were tested against 207 Streptococcus pneumoniae and 200 beta-haemolytic streptococci. Ten comparators (azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin A, roxithromycin, ampicillin, co-amoxiclav, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) were tested against 143 Haemophilus influenzae and 58 Moraxella catarrhalis. The MIC50 of HMR 3647 for S. pneumoniae was < or =0.008 mg/L, less than that for the macrolides or quinolones tested. Pneumococci with an erythromycin A MIC of 0.06 mg/L (n = 23) had an MIC50 of HMR 3647 < or =0.008 mg/L, whereas isolates with an erythromycin A MIC > or =1 mg/L (n = 34) had an MIC50 of HMR 3647 of 0.03 mg/L, a four-fold increase. In contrast, the difference in macrolide MIC50s for the two groups was > or =64-fold. The MIC50s foro beta-haemolytic streptococci, classified by Lancefield group, were in the range 0.015 to 0.06 mg/L for HMR 3647. H. influenzae were categorized into three groups according to cefuroxime MIC: <1 mg/L (n = 72); 2-4 mg/L (n = 29); and >4 mg/L (n = 42). The MIC50 of HMR 3647 increased two-fold with increasing cefuroxime MICs; beta-lactam MICs increased much more markedly. The MIC50 of HMR 3647 for M. catarrhalis was 0.03 mg/L. HMR 3647 has good activity against respiratory tract pathogens but in-vitro susceptibility is affected by erythromycin A susceptibility in S. pneumoniae and beta-haemolytic streptococci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10588304     DOI: 10.1093/jac/44.4.445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  8 in total

1.  In vivo efficacy of the new ketolide telithromycin (HMR 3647) in murine infection models.

Authors:  A Bonnefoy; M Guitton; C Delachaume; P Le Priol; A M Girard
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  A critical review of the fluoroquinolones: focus on respiratory infections.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Kelly Ennis; Lavern Vercaigne; Andrew Walkty; Alfred S Gin; John Embil; Heather Smith; Daryl J Hoban
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Telithromycin.

Authors:  J A Balfour; D P Figgitt
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  In vitro activity of the new ketolide telithromycin compared with those of macrolides against Streptococcus pyogenes: influences of resistance mechanisms and methodological factors.

Authors:  P Bemer-Melchior; M E Juvin; S Tassin; A Bryskier; G C Schito; H B Drugeon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Telithromycin.

Authors:  Keri Wellington; Stuart Noble
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  The ketolides: a critical review.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Michael Walters; Ayman Noreddin; Lavern M Vercaigne; Aleksandra Wierzbowski; John M Embil; Alfred S Gin; Stephen Douthwaite; Daryl J Hoban
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Pharmacodynamic analysis of the microbiological efficacy of telithromycin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Jun Shi; Marc Pfister; Stephen G Jenkins; Sunny Chapel; Jeffrey S Barrett; Ruedi E Port; Dan Howard
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.577

8.  Update of practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults.

Authors:  Lionel A Mandell; John G Bartlett; Scott F Dowell; Thomas M File; Daniel M Musher; Cynthia Whitney
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 9.079

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.