Literature DB >> 10588220

Higher energy synchronized external direct current cardioversion for refractory atrial fibrillation.

W Saliba1, N Juratli, M K Chung, M J Niebauer, O Erdogan, R Trohman, B L Wilkoff, R Augostini, K A Mowrey, G R Nadzam, P J Tchou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of higher energy synchronized cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation refractory to standard energy direct current (DC) cardioversion.
BACKGROUND: Standard external electrical cardioversion fails to restore sinus rhythm in 5% to 30% of patients with atrial fibrillation.
METHODS: Patients with atrial fibrillation who failed to achieve sinus rhythm after at least two attempts at standard external cardioversion with 360 J were included in the study. Two external defibrillators, each connected to its own pair of R-2 patches in the anteroposterior position, were used to deliver a synchronized total of 720 J.
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients underwent cardioversion with 720 J. Mean weight was 117 +/- 23 kg (body mass index 48.3 +/- 4.1 kg/m2). Structural heart disease was present in 76% of patients. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 45 +/- 12%. Atrial fibrillation was present for over three months in 55% of the patients. Sinus rhythm was achieved in 46 (84%) of the 55 patients. No major complications were observed. No patient developed hemodynamic compromise and no documented cerebrovascular accident occurred within one month after cardioversion. Of the 46 successful cardioversions, 18 patients (39%) remained in sinus rhythm over a mean follow-up of 2.1 months.
CONCLUSIONS: External higher energy cardioversion is effective in restoring sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation refractory to standard energy DC cardioversion. This method is safe and does not result in clinical evidence of myocardial impairment. It may be a useful alternative to internal cardioversion because it could be done within the same setting of the failed standard cardioversion and obviates the need to withhold protective anticoagulation for internal cardioversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10588220     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00463-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  8 in total

1.  The outcome of direct current cardioversion (DCC) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in a district general hospital in Ireland.

Authors:  K P O'Rourke; C Cotter; D Mullane; P Thorpe; P Sullivan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Diabetes, Obesity and Atrial Fibrillation: Epidemiology, Mechanisms and Interventions.

Authors:  O Asghar; U Alam; S A Hayat; R Aghamohammadzadeh; A M Heagerty; R A Malik
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-08-31

3.  Initial experience with single lead intracardial cardioversion for refractory atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  H A van de Klippe; C P Allaart; J H Ruiter
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  High energy external cardioversion for refractory atrial fibrillation in postoperative tetralogy of fallot.

Authors:  N Madan; B W Robinson; J W Moore; M C Sokoloski
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Higher energy monophasic DC cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation: is it time to start at 360 joules?

Authors:  C Boos; M D Thomas; A Jones; E Clarke; G Wilbourne; R S More
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Orthogonal electrical cardioversion in atrial fibrillation refractory to biphasic shocks: a case series.

Authors:  Enrique Velázquez-Rodríguez; Hipólito Alfredo Pérez-Sandoval; Francisco Javier Rangel-Rojo
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-14

Review 7.  Obesity, diabetes and atrial fibrillation; epidemiology, mechanisms and interventions.

Authors:  O Asghar; U Alam; S A Hayat; R Aghamohammadzadeh; A M Heagerty; R A Malik
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2012-11

Review 8.  Postoperative arrhythmias after cardiac surgery: incidence, risk factors, and therapeutic management.

Authors:  Giovanni Peretto; Alessandro Durante; Luca Rosario Limite; Domenico Cianflone
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 1.866

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.