Literature DB >> 10588089

Significance of angiotensin type 1 receptor blockade: why are angiotensin II receptor blockers different?

T Unger1.   

Abstract

The angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are safe and effective agents in the treatment of hypertension, and they have potential in treating other cardiovascular disorders such as heart failure. These drugs share a common mechanism of action: They selectively block the angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor. A new ARB, candesartan cilexetil is a prodrug that is converted completely into the active metabolite candesartan during gastrointestinal absorption, whereas losartan is converted partially by hepatic metabolism into the more active compound EXP 3174. Valsartan and irbesartan are active in their own right. These ARBs differ pharmacologically in terms of their affinity for the AT1 receptor, the mechanism by which they block the receptor, and the duration of their receptor-blocking activity. In radioligand-binding studies, candesartan had a slightly higher affinity for the AT1 receptor than the other ARBs. In the rabbit aorta, candesartan blocked angiotensin II-induced contractions in an insurmountable manner, whereas losartan blocked the contractions competitively, and EXP 3174, valsortan and irbesartan blocked the contractions in a manner intermediate between competitive and insurmountable antagonism. The insurmountable antagonism exhibited by candesartan likely reflects its long-lasting blockade of the AT1 receptor due to a slow dissociation rate. This suggests that candesartan will exhibit a longer duration of action than would be predicted simply from its pharmacokinetic elimination half-life. Comparative clinical trials with several ARBs are needed to define the clinical significance of these pharmacologic differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10588089     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00728-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Estimation of the dissociation rate of unlabelled ligand-receptor complexes by a 'two-step' competition binding approach.

Authors:  A Packeu; M Wennerberg; A Balendran; G Vauquelin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Interference with the renin-angiotensin system in heart failure.

Authors:  R Schulz
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 3.  Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide: a review of its pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and place in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Keri Wellington; Diana M Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Simultaneous determination of related substances of telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in tablet dosage form by using reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic method.

Authors:  Sutirtho Mukhopadhyay; Kiran Kadam; Laxman Sawant; Dhanashree Nachane; Nancy Pandita
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2011-07

Review 5.  Differential pharmacology and benefit/risk of azilsartan compared to other sartans.

Authors:  Theodore W Kurtz; Takashi Kajiya
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2012-02-28

Review 6.  Azilsartan medoxomil in the management of hypertension: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy.

Authors:  Emiliano Angeloni
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2016-04-05

7.  Novel and validated titrimetric method for determination of selected angiotensin-II-receptor antagonists in pharmaceutical preparations and its comparison with UV spectrophotometric determination.

Authors:  Shrikant H Patil; Minakshi V Janjale
Journal:  J Pharm Anal       Date:  2012-04-09

Review 8.  Targeting effective blood pressure control with angiotensin receptor blockers.

Authors:  R Asmar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.503

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.