Literature DB >> 10587963

Umbilical cord blood gas analysis.

J A Thorp1, R S Rushing.   

Abstract

Umbilical cord blood gas and pH values should always be obtained in the high-risk delivery and whenever newborn depression occurs. This practice is important because umbilical cord blood gas analysis may assist with clinical management and excludes the diagnosis of birth asphyxia in approximately 80% of depressed newborns at term. The most useful umbilical cord blood parameter is arterial pH. Sampling umbilical venous blood alone is not recommended because arterial blood is more representative of the fetal metabolic condition and because arterial acidemia may occur with a normal venous pH. A complete blood gas analysis may provide important information regarding the type and cause of acidemia and sampling the artery and vein may provide a more clear assessment. The sampling technique is simple and easily mastered by any treatment person in the delivery room. Preheparinized syringes ensure a consistent dose and amount of heparin. Depending on how normality is defined and on the population studied, normal ranges for umbilical cord blood gas values vary (see Table 1). In general, the lower range for normal arterial pH extends to at least 7.10 and that for venous pH to at least 7.20. Many different factors during pregnancy, labor, and delivery can affect cord blood gases. Umbilical blood sampling for acid-base status at all deliveries cannot be universally recommended because many facilities do not have the capabilities to support such a practice and in doing so may impose an excessive financial burden. Considering the costs, the accumulated published data, and the nonspecificity of electronic fetal monitoring in the evaluation of fetal oxygenation, it may be more rational to implement universal cord blood gas analysis. Care providers and institutions with the logistical capabilities in place should consider the cost efficacy of routine cord blood gas analysis because it is the gold standard assessment of uteroplacental function and fetal oxygenation/acid-base status at birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10587963     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70107-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8545            Impact factor:   2.844


  13 in total

Review 1.  Interpretation of the Experts' Consensus on the criteria for the diagnosis and grading of neonatal asphyxia in China.

Authors:  Zi-Li Chen; Jing Liu
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2013-04

Review 2.  Use of umbilical cord blood gas analysis in the assessment of the newborn.

Authors:  L Armstrong; B J Stenson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 3.  Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gemma L Malin; Rachel K Morris; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-05-13

4.  Predicting long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm neonates by umbilical cord gas parameters.

Authors:  Sima H Baalbaki; S Lindsay Wood; Alan T Tita; Jeff M Szychowski; William W Andrews; Akila Subramaniam
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2020-10-06

5.  The human fetus preferentially secretes corticosterone, rather than cortisol, in response to intra-partum stressors.

Authors:  Katherine E Wynne-Edwards; Heather E Edwards; Trina M Hancock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Placental adaptations in a nonhuman primate model of gestational protein restriction.

Authors:  Victoria H J Roberts; Jessica E Gaffney; Terry K Morgan; Antonio E Frias
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.034

7.  Attitudes towards the implementation of universal umbilical artery lactate analysis in a South African district hospital.

Authors:  Emma R Allanson; Kate Grobicki; Robert C Pattinson; Jan E Dickinson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Clinical practice outcomes and differential results in maternal and neonatal morbidity among pregnant women in Spain who are candidates for a normal birth: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ana Casteleiro; M Santibanez; Paula Paras-Bravo; Amada Pellico-Lopez; María Paz-Zulueta
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Outcomes of extremely low birthweight infants with acidosis at birth.

Authors:  David A Randolph; Tracy L Nolen; Namasivayam Ambalavanan; Waldemar A Carlo; Myriam Peralta-Carcelen; Abhik Das; Edward F Bell; Alexis S Davis; Abbot R Laptook; Barbara J Stoll; Seetha Shankaran; Rosemary D Higgins
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.747

10.  Lactate point-of-care testing for acidosis: Cross-comparison of two devices with routine laboratory results.

Authors:  Remco van Horssen; Teska N Schuurman; Monique J M de Groot; Bernadette S Jakobs
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2015-12-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.