Literature DB >> 10587869

Detection of groin hernia with physical examination, ultrasound, and MRI compared with laparoscopic findings.

J C van den Berg1, J C de Valois, P M Go, G Rosenbusch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of physical examination, ultrasound, and dynamic MRI in patients with inguinal hernia.
METHODS: In 41 patients with clinically evident herniations, 82 groins were evaluated using a standard ultrasound and MRI protocol, the latter including T1- and T2-weighted sequences as well as two dynamic sequences. All ultrasound examinations and MRI scans were reviewed without knowledge of clinical findings. In all cases, correlation with findings at laparoscopic surgery was made.
RESULTS: At surgery, 55 inguinal herniations were found. Physical examination revealed 42 herniations (one false-positive finding), whereas ultrasound made the diagnosis of a hernia in 56 cases (five false-positive and four false-negative findings). MRI diagnosed 53 herniations (one false-positive and three false-negative findings). Thus, sensitivity and specificity figures were 74.5% and 96.3% for physical examination, 92.7% and 81.5% for ultrasound, and 94.5% and 96.3% for MRI.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with clinically uncertain herniations, MRI is a valid diagnostic tool with a high positive predictive value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10587869     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199912000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  32 in total

1.  Computed tomography scan diagnosis of occult groin hernia.

Authors:  J F W Garvey
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  EAES Consensus Development Conference on endoscopic repair of groin hernias.

Authors:  M M Poelman; B van den Heuvel; J D Deelder; G S A Abis; N Beudeker; R R Bittner; G Campanelli; D van Dam; B J Dwars; H H Eker; A Fingerhut; I Khatkov; F Koeckerling; J F Kukleta; M Miserez; A Montgomery; R M Munoz Brands; S Morales Conde; F E Muysoms; M Soltes; W Tromp; Y Yavuz; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Pubic inguinal pain syndrome: the so-called sports hernia.

Authors:  G Campanelli
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  [Hernia surgery in urology: part 1: inguinal, femoral and umbilical hernias - fundamentals of clinical diagnostics and treatment].

Authors:  T Franz; T Schwalenberg; A Dietrich; J Müller; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Is herniography useful?

Authors:  J P Garner; S Patel; J Glaves; K Ravi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Evaluation of the usage and influence of groin ultrasound in primary and secondary healthcare settings.

Authors:  B Kim; P Robinson; H Modi; H Gupta; K Horgan; R Achuthan
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of radiology in the diagnosis of occult inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Amy Robinson; Duncan Light; Adetayo Kasim; Colin Nice
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Sportsmen hernia: what do we know?

Authors:  S Morales-Conde; M Socas; A Barranco
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Chronic pain after TEP inguinal hernia repair, does MRI reveal a cause?

Authors:  J P J Burgmans; C E H Voorbrood; T Van Dalen; R N Boxhoorn; G J Clevers; F B M Sanders; D B J Naafs; R K J Simmermacher
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  The accuracy of ultrasonography in classification of groin hernias according to the criteria of the unified classification system.

Authors:  A Djuric-Stefanovic; D Saranovic; A Ivanovic; D Masulovic; M Zuvela; M Bjelovic; P Pesko
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.