Literature DB >> 10587555

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sclerosing injections in patients with chronic low back pain.

E Dechow1, R K Davies, A J Carr, P W Thompson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical efficacy of sclerosing injections in patients with chronic low back pain.
METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of three, once weekly injections of dextrose-glycerine-phenol with lignocaine vs saline plus lignocaine in patients with mechanical back pain of more than 6 months' duration. All patient assessments were performed blind by an experienced physiotherapist. The injections to the ligaments of the L4-5 and L5-S1 lumbar motion segments were given by an orthopaedic physician experienced in the technique, blinded to the nature of the injection solution according to a standard protocol. Demographic and clinical data, the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire, the modified Somatic Pain Questionnaire, the Zung Depression Inventory, Oswestry Disability Scale and the modified Schober method of measuring spinal flexion were undertaken at 0, 1, 3 and 6 months.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients [mean (S.D.) age 45(11) yr, female:male ratio 1:1, median pain duration >10 yr] were recruited and there were no drop-outs over the study period. There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics between the placebo and treatment groups at baseline or for any measure at follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Three, weekly sclerosant injections alone may not be effective treatment in many patients with undifferentiated chronic back pain. Patient selection and combination with other treatment modalities may be factors in determining treatment success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10587555     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.12.1255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  6 in total

Review 1.  Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Seppo Seitsalo; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Imperfect placebos are common in low back pain trials: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  L A C Machado; S J Kamper; R D Herbert; C G Maher; J H McAuley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Prolotherapy in primary care practice.

Authors:  David Rabago; Andrew Slattengren; Aleksandra Zgierska
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.907

Review 4.  Prolotherapy injections for chronic low-back pain.

Authors:  S Dagenais; M J Yelland; C Del Mar; M L Schoene
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

5.  Early inflammatory response of knee ligaments to prolotherapy in a rat model.

Authors:  Kristina T Jensen; David P Rabago; Thomas M Best; Jeffrey J Patterson; Ray Vanderby
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Reliability and validity of the Turkish version short-form McGill pain questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Yavuz Yakut; Edibe Yakut; Kiliçhan Bayar; Fatma Uygur
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.650

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.