Literature DB >> 10587392

Comparative evaluation of externally supported Dacron and polytetrafluoroethylene prosthetic bypasses for femorofemoral and axillofemoral arterial reconstructions. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #141.

W C Johnson1, K K Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Currently, the choice of a vascular prosthesis for an extra-anatomic arterial bypass graft is left to the surgeon's preference because well-designed comparative evaluations have not been performed. The Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study 141 was organized to identify whether there is improved patency with different prosthetic grafts for patients with femorofemoral or axillofemoral bypass grafts.
METHODS: Between June 1983 and June 1988, patients at 20 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers who had aortoiliac occlusive disease but were not considered suitable candidates for aortic bypass surgery were randomized to receive either an externally supported polytetrafluoroethylene or Dacron bypass graft for an extra anatomic bypass. Doppler-derived ankle brachial indices (ABIs) were determined before the operation and serially after the operation. Patients were seen in follow-up every 3 months for the first year and every 6 months thereafter. All patients were instructed to take 650 mg of aspirin each day for the duration of the study. A bypass graft was considered to be patent if the Doppler-derived postoperative ABI remained significantly improved (0.15 units above the preoperative value), and additional clinical information (such as subsequent ABIs, angiograms, or operations) did not contradict these observations.
RESULTS: Three hundred forty patients with femorofemoral bypass grafts and 79 patients with axillofemoral or axillofemorofemoral bypass grafts were randomized. The indication for the bypass operation was limb salvage in 72% of the patients. The assisted primary patency rate for a Dacron bypass grafting was 79% at 1 year, 63% at 3 years, and 50% at 5 years; for polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting, the patency was 77% at 1 year, 62% at 3 years, and 47% at 5 years.
CONCLUSION: The overall results of this prospective randomized study suggest that the current choices of prosthetic bypass grafting have similar long-term patency in patients who undergo femorofemoral or axillofemoral vascular reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10587392     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70046-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  7 in total

1.  Primary bypass surgery from the descending aorta to the iliac arteries for a severely calcified aorta: report of two cases.

Authors:  Osamu Sato; Hiroyuki Okamoto; Harunobu Matsumoto; Kouji Ogata; Keisuke Kondoh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Marie D Gerhard-Herman; Heather L Gornik; Coletta Barrett; Neal R Barshes; Matthew A Corriere; Douglas E Drachman; Lee A Fleisher; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Naomi M Hamburg; Scott Kinlay; Robert Lookstein; Sanjay Misra; Leila Mureebe; Jeffrey W Olin; Rajan A G Patel; Judith G Regensteiner; Andres Schanzer; Mehdi H Shishehbor; Kerry J Stewart; Diane Treat-Jacobson; M Eileen Walsh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-11-13       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Postoperative peri-axillary seroma following axillary artery cannulation for surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Efstratios E Apostolakis; Nikolaos G Baikoussis; Konstantinos Katsanos; Menelaos Karanikolas
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 4.  2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Marie D Gerhard-Herman; Heather L Gornik; Coletta Barrett; Neal R Barshes; Matthew A Corriere; Douglas E Drachman; Lee A Fleisher; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Naomi M Hamburg; Scott Kinlay; Robert Lookstein; Sanjay Misra; Leila Mureebe; Jeffrey W Olin; Rajan A G Patel; Judith G Regensteiner; Andres Schanzer; Mehdi H Shishehbor; Kerry J Stewart; Diane Treat-Jacobson; M Eileen Walsh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-11-13       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The Comparison between Axillofemoral Bypass and Endovascular Treatment for Patients with Challenging Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease as Alternative Treatment to Aortofemoral Bypass.

Authors:  Masato Nishizawa; Kimihiro Igari; Sotaro Katsui; Toshifumi Kudo; Hiroyuki Uetake
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2020-06-25

Review 6.  Dacron vs. PTFE as bypass materials in peripheral vascular surgery--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie Roll; Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn; Thomas Keil; Hans Scholz; Daniela Eidt; Wolfgang Greiner; Stefan N Willich
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  The outcome of the axillofemoral bypass: a retrospective analysis of 45 patients.

Authors:  Marjolein H Liedenbaum; Froukje J Verdam; David Spelt; Hans G W de Groot; Jan van der Waal; Lijckle van der Laan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.