Literature DB >> 10587184

Utility of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography scanning on selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases.

Y Fong1, P F Saldinger, T Akhurst, H Macapinlac, H Yeung, R D Finn, A Cohen, N Kemeny, L H Blumgart, S M Larson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatectomy represents a standard and potentially curative therapy for hepatic colorectal metastases. However, up to two thirds of patients explored for resection are found to have unsuspected disease, which precludes resection.
METHODS: In order to determine if 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) scanning may prevent unnecessary surgery, a group of 40 patients being considered for hepatic resection but at high risk for unresectable disease by clinical criteria were subjected to whole body 18F-FDG-PET scanning. Effect on clinical outcome was evaluated. In addition, PET findings in the 25 patients who underwent resection of hepatic metastases were directly compared with the resected specimen to determine the sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET scanning in the liver.
RESULTS: Findings on 18F-FDG-PET scanning influenced the clinical management in 16 patients (40%) and directly altered management in 9 cases (23%). Six patients were spared laparotomy, and 3 others had PET-directed surgery that found extrahepatic tumor and spared the patient unwarranted liver resection. In 3 cases PET missed peritoneal metastases found on laparotomy. In these cases all missed tumors were less than 1 cm in size. Out of 52 resected hepatic lesions, 18F-FDG-PET detected 37. Within the liver, sensitivity of detection was also related to size. Only 25% of hepatic lesions smaller than 1 cm were detected by PET, while 85% of lesions larger than 1 cm were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET is best for detecting extrahepatic disease. There are few false positives, and surgeons should carefully evaluate and biopsy extrahepatic positive sites. This test should be used for patients at high risk for extrahepatic disease and should be evaluated prospectively for all patients under consideration for liver resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10587184     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00187-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  47 in total

1.  Survival of patients staged by FDG-PET before resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; Barry A Siegal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  "Vanishing liver metastases"-A real challenge for liver surgeons.

Authors:  Alex Zendel; Eylon Lahat; Yael Dreznik; Barak Bar Zakai; Rony Eshkenazy; Arie Ariche
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Short-term and long-term outcomes after simultaneous resection of colorectal malignancies and synchronous liver metastases.

Authors:  Eduardo de Santibañes; Diego Fernandez; Carlos Vaccaro; Guillermo Ojea Quintana; Fernando Bonadeo; Juan Pekolj; Carlos Bonofiglio; Ernesto Molmenti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  18F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  B B Chin; R L Wahl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Adena Scheer; Rebecca Ann C Auer
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-11

6.  Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  O J Garden; M Rees; G J Poston; D Mirza; M Saunders; J Ledermann; J N Primrose; R W Parks
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Optical glucose analogs of aminolevulinic acid for fluorescence-guided tumor resection and photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Eduardo H Moriyama; Weiguo Cao; Tracy W Liu; Han Lin Wang; Peter D Kim; Juan Chen; Gang Zheng; Brian C Wilson
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Does the novel PET/CT imaging modality impact on the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer of the liver?

Authors:  Markus Selzner; Thomas F Hany; Peer Wildbrett; Lucas McCormack; Zakiyah Kadry; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Is there a role for endoscopic ultrasonography in evaluation of the left liver in colorectal liver metastasis patients selected for right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Charles Sabbagh; David Fuks; Jean-Paul Joly; Thierry Yzet; Adina Hanes; Jean-Christophe Duchmann; Jean-Christophe Prevost; Fabien Demuynck; Pierre Verhaeghe; Jean-Marc Regimbeau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Role of PET/CT in the detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Orlacchio; O Schillaci; N Fusco; P Broccoli; M Maurici; M Yamgoue; R Danieli; S D'Urso; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.