Literature DB >> 10587120

Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy.

M M Morrin1, J B Kruskal, R J Farrell, S N Goldberg, J B McGee, V Raptopoulos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the clinical usefulness of endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete colonoscopy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 40 patients in whom the cecum could not be reached endoscopically despite adequate bowel preparation. Endoluminal CT colonography (120 kVp, 120 mA, 3-mm collimation, pitch of 2, 1.5-mm interval reconstruction) was performed within 2 hr of incomplete colonoscopy. Two-dimensional multiplanar reformatted images and three-dimensional endoluminal images were analyzed. Twenty-six patients (65%) underwent barium enema immediately after endoluminal CT colonography. We analyzed colonic distention; duration of endoluminal CT colonography; patient tolerance; number of colonic segments seen at colonoscopy, endoluminal CT colonography, and barium enema; and reasons for incomplete colonoscopy as well as colonic and extracolonic findings.
RESULTS: Duration of endoluminal CT colonography was 14.2 +/- 4.6 min (mean +/- SD). Endoluminal CT colonography was better tolerated than colonoscopy or barium enema (p < .001). Probable causes for incomplete colonoscopy were identified at endoluminal CT colonography in 74% of 40 patients. Baseline colonic distention in the region of the transverse and right colon was considered adequate before additional air insufflation; however, the addition of air significantly enhanced colonic distention throughout the entire colon (p < .001). Endoluminal CT colonography adequately revealed 96% of all colonic segments; in comparison, barium enema adequately revealed 91% of all segments (p < .05).
CONCLUSION: In patients with incomplete colonoscopy, endoluminal CT colonography successfully showed the previously unrevealed colon in more than 90% of patients. Endoluminal CT colonography is a rapid, well-tolerated technique that provides clinically useful colonic and extracolonic information and should be considered for all patients who undergo incomplete colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10587120     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.172.4.10587120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  30 in total

Review 1.  Trends in CT colonography.

Authors:  J F Bruzzi; D D Brennan; H M Fenlon
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-10

Review 2.  The diagnostic and therapeutic roles of colonoscopy: a review.

Authors:  E H Huang; J M Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Expert commentary--virtual colonoscopy: utility as a screening test for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Michael L Kochman; Bernard Levin
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-01-26

4.  Endoscopic management of failed colonoscopy in clinical practice: to change endoscopist, instrument, or both?

Authors:  Sergio Morini; Angelo Zullo; Cesare Hassan; Roberto Lorenzetti; Salvatore M A Campo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Performing an additional decubitus series at CT colonography.

Authors:  Christopher M Buchach; David H Kim; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2011-10

6.  CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Gryspeerdt; P Lefere; M Herman; R Deman; L Rutgeerts; G Ghillebert; F Baert; M Baekelandt; B Van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Current status of CT colonography.

Authors:  Suzanne M Frentz; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 8.  CT colonography: an update.

Authors:  Andrik J Aschoff; Andrea S Ernst; Hans-Juergen Brambs; Markus S Juchems
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Massimo Falchini; Andrea-Giovanni Bonanomi; Guido Castiglione; Stefano Ciatto; Paola Mantellini; Francesco Mungai; Ilario Menchi; Natale Villari; Mario Mascalchi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.