C J Zeiss1, G M Acland, G D Aguirre. 1. James A. Baker Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the course of photoreceptor disease in canine X-linked retinal degeneration. METHODS: Retinas from 55 dogs (44 males, 8 carrier females, 3 homozygous females) were obtained by enucleation under general anesthesia. After fixation and dehydration, tissues were embedded in epoxy resin, sectioned at 1 microm for light microscopy and stained with azure II/methylene blue and a paraphenylenediamine counterstain. For electron microscopy, regions identified by light microscopy were selected and cut at 60 nm. Sections were stained with uranyl acetate-lead citrate. Electroretinography from an additional group of normal males, affected males, and carrier females was performed and the rod and cone responses evaluated. RESULTS: The earliest lesion detectable by electron microscopy was vesiculation of rod discs, followed by disruption of outer segments and death of rods. Loss of cones and progressive atrophy of inner retinal layers followed. Lesions were most severe in the peripheral retina and advanced toward the optic disc with disease progression. Significant variation in disease severity was present in males despite the presence of the same disease allele in all affected dogs. Carrier females displayed generalized reduction in photoreceptor density as well as multifocal areas of complete rod loss. The electroretinogram (ERG) findings were compatible with the histopathologic abnormalities. Homozygous females had lesions similar to those seen in affected males. CONCLUSIONS: X-linked retinal degeneration is characterized by initial degeneration of rod photoreceptors, followed by loss of cones and progressive atrophy of the inner retina. Carrier females display a phenotype consistent with random X-chromosome inactivation. Variation in genetic background may alter expression of the disease allele in affected animals, thus accounting for variation in phenotypic expression of the disease.
PURPOSE: To describe the course of photoreceptor disease in canineX-linked retinal degeneration. METHODS: Retinas from 55 dogs (44 males, 8 carrier females, 3 homozygous females) were obtained by enucleation under general anesthesia. After fixation and dehydration, tissues were embedded in epoxy resin, sectioned at 1 microm for light microscopy and stained with azure II/methylene blue and a paraphenylenediamine counterstain. For electron microscopy, regions identified by light microscopy were selected and cut at 60 nm. Sections were stained with uranyl acetate-lead citrate. Electroretinography from an additional group of normal males, affected males, and carrier females was performed and the rod and cone responses evaluated. RESULTS: The earliest lesion detectable by electron microscopy was vesiculation of rod discs, followed by disruption of outer segments and death of rods. Loss of cones and progressive atrophy of inner retinal layers followed. Lesions were most severe in the peripheral retina and advanced toward the optic disc with disease progression. Significant variation in disease severity was present in males despite the presence of the same disease allele in all affected dogs. Carrier females displayed generalized reduction in photoreceptor density as well as multifocal areas of complete rod loss. The electroretinogram (ERG) findings were compatible with the histopathologic abnormalities. Homozygous females had lesions similar to those seen in affected males. CONCLUSIONS:X-linked retinal degeneration is characterized by initial degeneration of rod photoreceptors, followed by loss of cones and progressive atrophy of the inner retina. Carrier females display a phenotype consistent with random X-chromosome inactivation. Variation in genetic background may alter expression of the disease allele in affected animals, thus accounting for variation in phenotypic expression of the disease.
Authors: William A Beltran; Artur V Cideciyan; Alfred S Lewin; Simone Iwabe; Hemant Khanna; Alexander Sumaroka; Vince A Chiodo; Diego S Fajardo; Alejandro J Román; Wen-Tao Deng; Malgorzata Swider; Tomas S Alemán; Sanford L Boye; Sem Genini; Anand Swaroop; William W Hauswirth; Samuel G Jacobson; Gustavo D Aguirre Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: William A Beltran; Artur V Cideciyan; Alfred S Lewin; William W Hauswirth; Samuel G Jacobson; Gustavo D Aguirre Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 6.915
Authors: William A Beltran; Artur V Cideciyan; Simone Iwabe; Malgorzata Swider; Mychajlo S Kosyk; Kendra McDaid; Inna Martynyuk; Gui-Shuang Ying; James Shaffer; Wen-Tao Deng; Sanford L Boye; Alfred S Lewin; William W Hauswirth; Samuel G Jacobson; Gustavo D Aguirre Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Valérie L Dufour; Artur V Cideciyan; Guo-Jie Ye; Chunjuan Song; Adrian Timmers; Perry L Habecker; Wei Pan; Nicole M Weinstein; Malgorzata Swider; Amy C Durham; Gui-Shuang Ying; Paulette M Robinson; Samuel G Jacobson; David R Knop; Jeffrey D Chulay; Mark S Shearman; Gustavo D Aguirre; William A Beltran Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 5.695
Authors: William A Beltran; Artur V Cideciyan; Shannon E Boye; Guo-Jie Ye; Simone Iwabe; Valerie L Dufour; Luis Felipe Marinho; Malgorzata Swider; Mychajlo S Kosyk; Jin Sha; Sanford L Boye; James J Peterson; C Douglas Witherspoon; John J Alexander; Gui-Shuang Ying; Mark S Shearman; Jeffrey D Chulay; William W Hauswirth; Paul D Gamlin; Samuel G Jacobson; Gustavo D Aguirre Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2017-05-27 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Tomas S Aleman; Artur V Cideciyan; Alexander Sumaroka; Sharon B Schwartz; Alejandro J Roman; Elizabeth A M Windsor; Janet D Steinberg; Kari Branham; Mohammad Othman; Anand Swaroop; Samuel G Jacobson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Richard Guyon; Susan E Pearce-Kelling; Caroline J Zeiss; Gregory M Acland; Gustavo D Aguirre Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2007-07-11 Impact factor: 2.367