Literature DB >> 10586880

The dynamics of chromosome evolution in birds and mammals.

D W Burt1, C Bruley, I C Dunn, C T Jones, A Ramage, A S Law, D R Morrice, I R Paton, J Smith, D Windsor, A Sazanov, R Fries, D Waddington.   

Abstract

Comparative mapping, which compares the location of homologous genes in different species, is a powerful tool for studying genome evolution. Comparative maps suggest that rates of chromosomal change in mammals can vary from one to ten rearrangements per million years. On the basis of these rates we would expect 84 to 600 conserved segments in a chicken comparison with human or mouse. Here we build comparative maps between these species and estimate that numbers of conserved segments are in the lower part of this range. We conclude that the organization of the human genome is closer to that of the chicken than the mouse and by adding comparative mapping results from a range of vertebrates, we identify three possible phases of chromosome evolution. The relative stability of genomes such as those of the chicken and human will enable the reconstruction of maps of ancestral vertebrates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10586880     DOI: 10.1038/46555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  101 in total

1.  A consensus linkage map of the chicken genome.

Authors:  M A Groenen; H H Cheng; N Bumstead; B F Benkel; W E Briles; T Burke; D W Burt; L B Crittenden; J Dodgson; J Hillel; S Lamont; A P de Leon; M Soller; H Takahashi; A Vignal
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Determination of the number of conserved chromosomal segments between species.

Authors:  S Kumar; S R Gadagkar; A Filipski; X Gu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Compositional mapping of chicken chromosomes and identification of the gene-richest regions.

Authors:  L Andreozzi; C Federico; S Motta; S Saccone; A L Sazanova; A A Sazanov; A F Smirnov; S A Galkina; N A Lukina; A V Rodionov; N Carels; G Bernardi
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells.

Authors:  F A Habermann; M Cremer; J Walter; G Kreth; J von Hase; K Bauer; J Wienberg; C Cremer; T Cremer; I Solovei
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates.

Authors:  Hideyuki Tanabe; Stefan Müller; Michaela Neusser; Johann von Hase; Enzo Calcagno; Marion Cremer; Irina Solovei; Christoph Cremer; Thomas Cremer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Chromosomal localization of the genes encoding SCNN1A, BTG1, IFNG and MAOA on chicken chromosome 1 by fluorescence in-situ hybridization.

Authors:  F A Habermann; C Biet; R Fries
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Conserved vertebrate chromosome segments in the large salamander genome.

Authors:  S R Voss; J J Smith; D M Gardiner; D M Parichy
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Comparative map between chicken chromosome 15 and human chromosomal region 12q24 and 22q11-q12.

Authors:  Danyel G J Jennen; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Bram Kamps; Rukiye Açar; Jan J van der Poel; Martien A M Groenen
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  A BAC-based physical map of the chicken genome.

Authors:  Chengwei Ren; Mi-Kyung Lee; Bo Yan; Kejiao Ding; Bettye Cox; Michael N Romanov; Jennifer A Price; Jerry B Dodgson; Hong-Bin Zhang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Avian comparative genomics: reciprocal chromosome painting between domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) and the stone curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus, Charadriiformes)--an atypical species with low diploid number.

Authors:  Wenhui Nie; Patricia C M O'Brien; Bee L Ng; Beiyuan Fu; Vitaly Volobouev; Nigel P Carter; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.