Literature DB >> 10586459

Activity restrictions after posterior lumbar discectomy. A prospective study of outcomes in 152 cases with no postoperative restrictions.

E J Carragee1, M Y Han, B Yang, D H Kim, H Kraemer, J Billys.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective clinical trial was conducted.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of removing activity restrictions after surgery and encouraging early return to work; to ascertain the clinical and behavioral response to such a strategy; and to identify factors predictive of early return to work, preparatory to possible randomized clinical trials. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Current practice usually entails several weeks to several months of restricted activities after lumbar discectomy to avoid disc "reinjury." Earlier work has suggested these restrictions may not be necessary.
METHODS: One hundred fifty-two consecutive working patients undergoing limited open discectomy for herniated lumbar intervertebral disc were treated postoperatively with no activity restrictions. Patients were encouraged to return to full activities as soon as possible. The patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years (average follow-up time = 4.8 years). At follow-up, an independent examiner evaluated each patient and collected further postoperative data.
RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine of the 152 patients (98%) returned to work. The average work loss was 1.2 weeks and 148 of 149 patients had returned to full duty by 8 weeks. Approximately one-third of the group returned to work within 1 week of surgery (32%), many the next day. Statistical analysis demonstrated very early return to work did not correlate with either recurrent sciatica, reoperation for reherniation, or ultimate clinical outcome. Seventeen patients (11.2%) had possible reherniations (recurrent sciatica) and eight underwent reoperation (5.3%).
CONCLUSION: Lifting of postoperative activity restrictions after limited discectomy allowed shortened time to return to work relative to the 4 to 16 weeks commonly recommended. Complication rates appear comparable to those reported in the literature for patients under postoperative restrictions. Postoperative restrictions may not be necessary in most patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10586459     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199911150-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  27 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation, selected for one-level open-discectomy and microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Kotryna Veresciagina; Bronius Spakauskas; Kazys Vytautas Ambrozaitis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A survey of post-operative management for patients following first time lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Esther Williamson; Louise White; Alison Rushton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A history of lumbar disc herniation from Hippocrates to the 1990s.

Authors:  Eeric Truumees
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A meta-analysis of endoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disk herniation.

Authors:  Lin Cong; Yue Zhu; Guanjun Tu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Learning curve of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Hsien-Ta Hsu; Shang-Jen Chang; Stephen S Yang; Chung Liang Chai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  The development of an evidence-based patient booklet for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy and un-instrumented decompression.

Authors:  A H McGregor; A K Burton; P Sell; G Waddell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  The role of stem cell therapies in degenerative lumbar spine disease: a review.

Authors:  David Oehme; Tony Goldschlager; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Peter Ghosh; Graham Jenkin
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 8.  Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Raj M Amin; Nicholas S Andrade; Brian J Neuman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

Review 9.  Persistent radiculopathy after surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation: causes and treatment options.

Authors:  Ashley Rogerson; Jessica Aidlen; Louis G Jenis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Risk factors for back pain-related loss of working time after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  K Puolakka; J Ylinen; M H Neva; H Kautiainen; A Häkkinen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.