BACKGROUND: Lymphatic drainage in the head and neck region is known to be particularly complex. This study explores the value of sentinel node biopsy for melanoma in the head and neck region. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with clinically localized cutaneous melanoma in the head and neck region were included. Sentinel node biopsy was performed with blue dye and a gamma probe after preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. Average follow-up was 23 months (range, 1-48). RESULTS: In 27 of 30 patients, a sentinel node was identified (90%). Only 53% of sentinel nodes were both blue and radioactive. A sentinel node was tumor-positive in 8 patients. The sentinel node was false-negative in two cases. Sensitivity of the procedure was 80% (8 of 10). CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel node biopsy in the head and neck region is a technically demanding procedure. Although it may help determine whether a neck dissection is necessary in certain patients, further investigation is required before this technique can be recommended for the standard management of cutaneous head and neck melanoma. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 22: 27-33, 2000.
BACKGROUND: Lymphatic drainage in the head and neck region is known to be particularly complex. This study explores the value of sentinel node biopsy for melanoma in the head and neck region. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with clinically localized cutaneous melanoma in the head and neck region were included. Sentinel node biopsy was performed with blue dye and a gamma probe after preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. Average follow-up was 23 months (range, 1-48). RESULTS: In 27 of 30 patients, a sentinel node was identified (90%). Only 53% of sentinel nodes were both blue and radioactive. A sentinel node was tumor-positive in 8 patients. The sentinel node was false-negative in two cases. Sensitivity of the procedure was 80% (8 of 10). CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel node biopsy in the head and neck region is a technically demanding procedure. Although it may help determine whether a neck dissection is necessary in certain patients, further investigation is required before this technique can be recommended for the standard management of cutaneous head and neck melanoma. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 22: 27-33, 2000.
Authors: Annette H Chakera; Birger Hesse; Zeynep Burak; James R Ballinger; Allan Britten; Corrado Caracò; Alistair J Cochran; Martin G Cook; Krzysztof T Drzewiecki; Richard Essner; Einat Even-Sapir; Alexander M M Eggermont; Tanja Gmeiner Stopar; Christian Ingvar; Martin C Mihm; Stanley W McCarthy; Nicola Mozzillo; Omgo E Nieweg; Richard A Scolyer; Hans Starz; John F Thompson; Giuseppe Trifirò; Giuseppe Viale; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Roger Uren; Wendy Waddington; Arturo Chiti; Alain Spatz; Alessandro Testori Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: D Evrard; E Routier; C Mateus; G Tomasic; J Lombroso; F Kolb; C Robert; A Moya-Plana Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Antonio I Picon; Daniel G Coit; Ashok R Shaha; Mary S Brady; Jay O Boyle; Bhuvanesh B Singh; Richard J Wong; Klaus J Busam; Jatin P Shah; Dennis H Kraus Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2006-05-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Johannes H W de Wilt; John F Thompson; Roger F Uren; Vivian S K Ka; Richard A Scolyer; William H McCarthy; Christopher J O'Brien; Michael J Quinn; Kerwin F Shannon Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 12.969