Planar signalling is not sufficient to generate a specific anterior/posterior neural pattern in pseudoexogastrula explants from Xenopus and Triturus.

Early observations on the morphology of total exogastrulae from urodeles (Axolotl) had provided evidence for essential vertical signalling mechanisms in the process of neural induction. Conversely, more recent studies with anurans (Xenopus laevis) making use of molecular markers for neural-specific gene expression appear to support the idea of planar signalling as providing sufficient information for neural differentiation along the anterior-posterior axis. In an attempt to resolve this apparent contradiction, we report on the comparative analysis of morphology and gene expression characteristics with explants prepared from both urodeles (Triturus alpestris) and anurans (Xenopus laevis). For this purpose, we have made use of a refined experimental protocol for the preparation of exogastrulae that is intended to combine the advantages of the Holtfreter type exogastrula and the Keller sandwich techniques, and which we refer to as pseudoexogastrula explants. Analysis of histology and expression of several neural and ectodermal marker genes in such explants suggests that neural differentiation is induced in both species, but only within the intermediate zone between ectoderm and endomesoderm. Therefore, experiments with Xenopus and Triturus explants described in this communication argue against planar signalling events as being sufficient to generate a specific anterior/posterior neural pattern.