Literature DB >> 10585042

Antegrade/retrograde cardioplegia for valve replacement: a prospective study.

F Dagenais1, L C Pelletier, M Carrier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: From 1994 to 1996, 75 patients undergoing valve replacement were randomized to antegrade (36 patients, group 1) or antegrade/retrograde (39 patients, group 2) administration of cold blood cardioplegia.
METHODS: Groups were comparable for age, sex, valve disease, and ventricular dysfunction. The aortic valve was replaced in 27 patients from group 1 and 24 patients from group 2, the mitral valve in 8 and 15 patients, and 1 patient in group 1 underwent double valve replacement (p = not significant).
RESULTS: Lengths of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp averaged, respectively, 10 minutes (p = not significant) and 12 minutes (p = < 0.05) shorter in group 2. Total amount of cardioplegia solution infused averaged 1,279 +/- 406 mL and 1,341 +/- 379 mL (p = not significant), respectively, in groups 1 and 2, and the period of infusion averaged 44% and 72% (p = < 0.01) of the total period of aortic cross-clamping. No death occurred in group 1 compared to two in group 2 (p = not significant). The perioperative myocardial infarction and stroke rates were comparable in both groups. Peak enzyme release at 24 hours was similar both for creatine kinase-MB fraction (26 versus 37 IU/L) and for troponin T (2.1 versus 2.5 IU/L).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows no significant advantage of the antegrade/retrograde administration of cardioplegia over the antegrade route in routine valvular replacement, other than a slightly shorter aortic cross-clamping time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10585042     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00837-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  2 in total

1.  Inflammatory and metabolic response of the myocardium during aortic valve surgery on the beating heart.

Authors:  Mirsad Kacila; Stefano Bevilaqua; Sasha Matteucci; Marco Solinas; Andrea Farnetti; Gianetti Jacopo; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 2.  Cardioprotection: a review of current practice in global ischemia and future translational perspective.

Authors:  Andreas Habertheuer; Alfred Kocher; Günther Laufer; Martin Andreas; Wilson Y Szeto; Peter Petzelbauer; Marek Ehrlich; Dominik Wiedemann
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.