Literature DB >> 10584948

Hand function following single ray amputation.

C A Peimer1, D R Wheeler, A Barrett, P G Goldschmidt.   

Abstract

We retrospectively studied primary and reconstructive single ray resection at 16 to 150 months after surgery (median, 41 months) in 25 patients (18 males) whose average age was 28 years. Cases were reviewed 16 to 154 months after surgery (median, 41 months). The injuries involved 14 dominant and 11 nondominant hands. Twelve patients had primary ray resection (< or =2 weeks after injury) and 13 had secondary/reconstructive amputation of 18 border and 7 central digits. Examinations and functional testing by Minnesota rate of manipulation and timed grooved pegboard tests were done and x-rays were reviewed. The majority of patients were subjectively satisfied with the appearance and function of the hand. Patients lost an average of 13 weeks of work (range, 2-24 weeks); those with primary resection were out of work 9 weeks (range, 2-17 weeks) and patients who had secondary resection lost a total of 16 weeks of work (range, 7-24 weeks). Twenty-one of the 25 patients returned to their preinjury occupation. Evaluation of nonwork plus settled workers' compensation cases versus nonsettled compensation/litigation cases showed that there were statistically significant differences in grip strength, key pinch, oppositional pinch, and Minnesota rate of manipulation test results. Primary ray removal limits the total costs associated with injury and disability; unsettled compensation/litigation issues produce statistically disparate and otherwise physically inexplicable differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10584948     DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.1999.1245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  11 in total

1.  Digital metastasis presenting as infection.

Authors:  Vasileios Kontogeorgakos; Anastasios Korompilias; Miltiadis Georgousis; Dionysios Papachristou
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2010-12-31

2.  Managing acrometastases treatment strategy with a case illustration.

Authors:  V Spiteri; A Bibra; N Ashwood; J Cobb
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Upper extremity amputations and prosthetics.

Authors:  Steven A Ovadia; Morad Askari
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 4.  Acrometastases.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; George Mimidis; Zinon T Kokkalis; Eirini-Sofia Karampi; Irene Karampela; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Apostolos Armaganidis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-09-08

5.  Economic analysis of revision amputation and replantation treatment of finger amputation injuries.

Authors:  Erika Davis Sears; Ryan Shin; Lisa A Prosser; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Reconstructive surgery of the amputated ring finger.

Authors:  Ricardo Monreal
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Functional and cosmetic outcome of single-digit ray amputation in hand.

Authors:  A K Bhat; A M Acharya; J K Narayanakurup; B Kumar; P S Nagpal; A Kamath
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-07-05

8.  Single ray amputation for tumors of the hand.

Authors:  Mark Edward Puhaindran; John H Healey; Edward A Athanasian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Single ray amputation in traumatic injury of the hand: review of literature.

Authors:  Filippo Calderazzi; Margherita Menozzi; Alessandro Nosenzo; Cristina Galavotti; Francesco Pogliacomi; Francesco Ceccarelli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2018-10-01

10.  Masquelet Technique and Arthrodesis for Digit Salvage of the Finger in Traumatic Bone Loss and Osteomyelitis: A Case Report.

Authors:  Parker L Brush; Gregory R Toci; Nicholas C Semenza; Daniel Fletcher; Pedro Beredjiklian; Daren Aita
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.