Literature DB >> 10584189

Are patients with antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis being over-investigated and overtreated?

D Misra1, S T Kempley, M F Hird.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is usually recommended that neonates with antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis are put on prophylactic antibiotics and undergo the following investigations--ultrasound, MCU and a radio-isotope renogram.
OBJECTIVE: To question the need for such an extensive protocol in antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis on the basis of an improved understanding of this condition.
METHODS: Over a 3-year-period, persistent postnatal hydronephrosis was seen in 42 neonates; in 12 it was bilateral. Antibiotic prophylaxis was stopped in the unilateral cases. An MCU was done mainly in the following circumstances: bilateral hydronephrosis, dilated ureter(s) or presence of UTI. A renogram was avoided if the AP diameter of the renal pelvis was below 15 mm and the calyces were not dilated.
RESULTS: 1) The AP diameter of the pelvis was recorded in 40 renal units as follows--< 15 mm--22, 15-20 mm--10, 20-40 mm--6, > 40 mm--2. Both the patients in the latter group needed a pyeloplasty--their AP diameter exceeded 8 cms and an RNS showed depressed function. 2) In those patients who did not receive antibiotics or had a MCU, none has had a UTI. 3) Four unilateral hydronephrotic kidneys showed a paradoxical supranormal function, ranging from 54-60%. The contralateral kidney was completely normal on the RNS.
CONCLUSION: 1) The vast majority of antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis have a benign course, only 2/54 or 3.7% required a pyeloplasty. 2) Invasive investigations like an MCU are not necessary in most cases. 3) Routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not required in all unilateral cases and in bilateral ones after VUR has been excluded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10584189     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1072269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0939-7248            Impact factor:   2.191


  6 in total

1.  Mild antenatal hydronephrosis: management controversies.

Authors:  Laura Alconcher; Marcela Tombesi
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 2.  Outcome of isolated antenatal hydronephrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gagan Sidhu; Joseph Beyene; Norman D Rosenblum
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Natural history of bilateral mild isolated antenatal hydronephrosis conservatively managed.

Authors:  Laura Fernanda Alconcher; Maria Marcela Tombesi
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Pyeloplasty in infancy.

Authors:  Kanishka Das; Ashley J D'Cruz
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 5.  Antenatal hydronephrosis: evaluation and outcome.

Authors:  Christopher S Cooper; Janet I Andrews; Wendy F Hansen; Jerome Yankowitz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.862

6.  From Research Question to Conducting a Randomized Controlled Trial on Continuous Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Prenatal Hydronephrosis: A Rational Stepwise Process.

Authors:  Luis H Braga; Bethany Easterbrook; Kizanee Jegatheeswaran; Armando J Lorenzo
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.418

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.