A M Wilson1, B J Lipworth. 1. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Abstract
AIMS: To determine the systemic dose-response relationships with oral prednisolone and inhaled fluticasone propionate administered in a putative 11:1 mg equivalent basis, in terms of effects on adrenal, bone and haematological markers. METHODS:Twelve asthmatic patients mean (s.e.) age, 28.8 [3.3] years, FEV1 94.7 [3.6]% predicted, FEF(25-75) 65.5 [6.1]% predicted were studied in a double-blind, double dummy randomised crossover design comparing placebo, inhaled fluticasone propionate via volumatic spacer given twice a day (ex actuator dose 0.44 mg day-1, 0.88 mg day-1, 1.76 mg day-1 ) and oral prednisolone given once daily (5 mg day-1, 10 mg day-1, 20 mg day-1 ). All treatments were for 4 days at each dose level with a 7-day washout at crossover. Measurements were made at 08.00 h after the last dose of each dose level for plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin and blood eosinophil count. RESULTS: There were significant dose-related effects for suppression of all three endpoints with both prednisolone and fluticasone propionate. Parallel slope analysis revealed a calculated dose ratio for relative potency of 8. 5:1 mg (95% CI 5.7-11.2) comparing Pred with FP for morning cortisol. The magnitude of suppression with FP was less for osteocalcin and eosinophils than for cortisol. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic tissues exhibit different dose-response relationships for the effects of inhaled and oral corticosteroids with suppression of cortisol being greater than osteocalcin or eosinophils. For cortisol suppression we observed an 8.5:1 mg relative potency ratio comparing prednisolone with fluticasone propionate. Patients taking high dose inhaled fluticasone propionate should therefore be screened for evidence of impaired adrenal reserve.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To determine the systemic dose-response relationships with oral prednisolone and inhaled fluticasone propionate administered in a putative 11:1 mg equivalent basis, in terms of effects on adrenal, bone and haematological markers. METHODS: Twelve asthmatic patients mean (s.e.) age, 28.8 [3.3] years, FEV1 94.7 [3.6]% predicted, FEF(25-75) 65.5 [6.1]% predicted were studied in a double-blind, double dummy randomised crossover design comparing placebo, inhaled fluticasone propionate via volumatic spacer given twice a day (ex actuator dose 0.44 mg day-1, 0.88 mg day-1, 1.76 mg day-1 ) and oral prednisolone given once daily (5 mg day-1, 10 mg day-1, 20 mg day-1 ). All treatments were for 4 days at each dose level with a 7-day washout at crossover. Measurements were made at 08.00 h after the last dose of each dose level for plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin and blood eosinophil count. RESULTS: There were significant dose-related effects for suppression of all three endpoints with both prednisolone and fluticasone propionate. Parallel slope analysis revealed a calculated dose ratio for relative potency of 8. 5:1 mg (95% CI 5.7-11.2) comparing Pred with FP for morning cortisol. The magnitude of suppression with FP was less for osteocalcin and eosinophils than for cortisol. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic tissues exhibit different dose-response relationships for the effects of inhaled and oral corticosteroids with suppression of cortisol being greater than osteocalcin or eosinophils. For cortisol suppression we observed an 8.5:1 mg relative potency ratio comparing prednisolone with fluticasone propionate. Patients taking high dose inhaled fluticasone propionate should therefore be screened for evidence of impaired adrenal reserve.
Authors: C G Adair; O McCallion; J C McElnay; M G Scott; B A Hamilton; J P McCann; C F Stanford; D P Nicholls Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1992-05 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: J Broide; R Soferman; S Kivity; A Golander; G Dickstein; Z Spirer; Y Weisman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: M Noonan; P Chervinsky; W W Busse; S C Weisberg; J Pinnas; B P de Boisblanc; H Boltansky; D Pearlman; L Repsher; D Kellerman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1995-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Harriet E Downing; Fran Carroll; Sara T Brookes; Sandra Hollinghurst; David Timmins; Elizabeth Orton; Kay Wang; Denise Kendrick; Paul Little; Mike V Moore; Anthony Harnden; Matthew Thompson; Margaret T May; Alastair D Hay Journal: Trials Date: 2015-03-07 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Mohsen Sadatsafavi; Amir Khakban; Hamid Tavakoli; Solmaz Ehteshami-Afshar; Larry D Lynd; J Mark FitzGerald Journal: Respir Res Date: 2021-04-09
Authors: Helen K Reddel; Leonard B Bacharier; Eric D Bateman; Christopher E Brightling; Guy G Brusselle; Roland Buhl; Alvaro A Cruz; Liesbeth Duijts; Jeffrey M Drazen; J Mark FitzGerald; Louise J Fleming; Hiromasa Inoue; Fanny W Ko; Jerry A Krishnan; Mark L Levy; Jiangtao Lin; Kevin Mortimer; Paulo M Pitrez; Aziz Sheikh; Arzu A Yorgancioglu; Louis-Philippe Boulet Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Helen K Reddel; Leonard B Bacharier; Eric D Bateman; Christopher E Brightling; Guy G Brusselle; Roland Buhl; Alvaro A Cruz; Liesbeth Duijts; Jeffrey M Drazen; J Mark FitzGerald; Louise J Fleming; Hiromasa Inoue; Fanny W Ko; Jerry A Krishnan; Mark L Levy; Jiangtao Lin; Kevin Mortimer; Paulo M Pitrez; Aziz Sheikh; Arzu A Yorgancioglu; Louis-Philippe Boulet Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 21.405