Literature DB >> 10582577

Phylogenetic invariants for genome rearrangements.

D Sankoff1, M Blanchette.   

Abstract

We review the combinatorial optimization problems in calculating edit distances between genomes and phylogenetic inference based on minimizing gene order changes. With a view to avoiding the computational cost and the "long branches attract" artifact of some tree-building methods, we explore the probabilization of genome rearrangement models prior to developing a methodology based on branch-length invariants. We characterize probabilistically the evolution of the structure of the gene adjacency set for reversals on unsigned circular genomes and, using a nontrivial recurrence relation, reversals on signed genomes. Concepts from the theory of invariants developed for the phylogenetics of homologous gene sequences can be used to derive a complete set of linear invariants for unsigned reversals, as well as for a mixed rearrangement model for signed genomes, though not for pure transposition or pure signed reversal models. The invariants are based on an extended Jukes-Cantor semigroup. We illustrate the use of these invariants to relate mitochondrial genomes from a number of invertebrate animals.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10582577     DOI: 10.1089/106652799318373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  4 in total

1.  OGRe: a relational database for comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Daniel Jameson; Andrew P Gibson; Cendrine Hudelot; Paul G Higgs
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Genome evolution at the genus level: comparison of three complete genomes of hyperthermophilic archaea.

Authors:  O Lecompte; R Ripp; V Puzos-Barbe; S Duprat; R Heilig; J Dietrich; J C Thierry; O Poch
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Estimation of rearrangement phylogeny for cancer genomes.

Authors:  Chris D Greenman; Erin D Pleasance; Scott Newman; Fengtang Yang; Beiyuan Fu; Serena Nik-Zainal; David Jones; King Wai Lau; Nigel Carter; Paul A W Edwards; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Genome trees constructed using five different approaches suggest new major bacterial clades.

Authors:  Y I Wolf; I B Rogozin; N V Grishin; R L Tatusov; E V Koonin
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 3.260

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.