Literature DB >> 10582561

Comparing regularized and non-regularized nonlinear dipole fit methods: a study in a simulated sulcus structure.

C H Wolters1, R F Beckmann, A Rienäcker, H Buchner.   

Abstract

The inverse problem arising from EEG and MEG is largely underdetermined. One strategy to alleviate this problem is the restriction to a limited number of point-like sources, the focal source model. Although the singular value decomposition of the spatio-temporal data gives an estimate of the minimal number of dipoles contributing to the measurement, the exact number is unknown in advance and noise complicates the reconstruction. Classical non-regularized nonlinear dipole fit algorithms do not give an estimate for the correct number because they are not stable with regard to an overestimation of this parameter. Too many sources may only describe noise but can still attain a large magnitude during the inverse procedure and may be indiscernible from the true sources. This paper describes a nonlinear dipole fit reconstruction algorithm with a new regularization approach for the embedded linear problem, automatically controlled by the noise in the data and the condition of the occuring least square problems. The algorithm is stable with regard to source components which "nearly" lie in the kernel of the projection or lead field operator and it thus gives an estimate of the unknown number parameter. EEG simulation studies in a simulated sulcus structure are carried out for an instantaneous dipole model and spatial resolution in the sulcus and stability of the new method are compared with a classical reconstruction algorithm without regularization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10582561     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022281005608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  5 in total

1.  Cortical processing of facial tactile stimuli in temporomandibular disorder as revealed by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Aurelio A Alonso; Ioannis G Koutlas; Arthur C Leuthold; Scott M Lewis; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model.

Authors:  Seok Lew; Carsten H Wolters; Alfred Anwander; Scott Makeig; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  LORETA With Cortical Constraint: Choosing an Adequate Surface Laplacian Operator.

Authors:  Todor Iordanov; Harald Bornfleth; Carsten H Wolters; Vesela Pasheva; Georgi Venkov; Benjamin Lanfer; Michael Scherg; Tobias Scherg
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  The effect of stimulation type, head modeling, and combined EEG and MEG on the source reconstruction of the somatosensory P20/N20 component.

Authors:  Marios Antonakakis; Sophie Schrader; Andreas Wollbrink; Robert Oostenveld; Stefan Rampp; Jens Haueisen; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Validating EEG, MEG and Combined MEG and EEG Beamforming for an Estimation of the Epileptogenic Zone in Focal Cortical Dysplasia.

Authors:  Frank Neugebauer; Marios Antonakakis; Kanjana Unnwongse; Yaroslav Parpaley; Jörg Wellmer; Stefan Rampp; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.