Literature DB >> 10581713

Mite population dynamics on different grape varieties with or without phytoseiids released (Acari: Phytoseiidae).

C Duso1, E Vettorazzo.   

Abstract

In a three-year study, mite populations were monitored in two vineyards, each having two grape varieties with different leaf hair density. In both vineyards native phytoseiids were present: Amblyseius andersoni in one vineyard, and Phytoseius finitimus in the other. The economically important predators Kampimodromus aberrans and Typhlodromus pyri were released in both vineyards in order to study their efficacy in controlling tetranychids and eriophyids and their persistence during periods of prey scarcity. In both vineyards, relative abundances of the mite species, especially phytoseiids, were found to differ on different varieties in the same vineyard. In the first experiment, A. andersoni reached higher densities and was more persistent on the variety with slightly pubescent leaf under-surface (Merlot). Typhlodromus pyri and K. aberrans releases were successful and the mites became more abundant on the variety with pubescent leaf under-surface (Verduzzo). In the second experiment, P. finitimus was more abundant on a variety with pubescent leaf under-surface (Prosecco) than with glabrous leaf under-surface (Riesling). The most interesting results of the present study concerned the interactions between native and released predators. In the first vineyard, different results were obtained when releasing T. pyri on the two varieties. On the variety with pubescent leaves, A. andersoni was rapidly displaced by T. pyri, whereas the former species persisted on the other variety throughout the three-year study, apparently becoming dominant during the last season. In contrast to T. pyri, interactions between K. aberrans and A. andersoni in this vineyard did not depend on variety. The results of the experiments carried out in the second vineyard stressed the importance of interspecific competition for phytoseiid releases. Typhlodromus pyri colonization failed on both varieties. Kampimodromus aberrans releases appeared to be more successful on Riesling than on Prosecco; where P. finitimus was more abundant. At the end of the experiments, K. aberrans displaced P. finitimus on both varieties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10581713     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006297225577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  1 in total

1.  Population growth and predation interference between two species of predatory phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in interactive systems.

Authors:  D S Yao; D A Chant
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.225

  1 in total
  20 in total

Review 1.  Leaf structures affect predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and biological control: a review.

Authors:  Rebecca A Schmidt
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Mating behavior of the predatory mite Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari: Phytoseiidae).

Authors:  Maria L Pappas; George D Broufas; Dimitris S Koveos
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Immigration of phytoseiid mites from surrounding uncultivated areas into a newly planted vineyard.

Authors:  Marie-Stéphane Tixier; Serge Kreiter; Brigitte Cheval; Sabine Guichou; Philippe Auger; Romain Bonafos
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 4.  The impact of eriophyoids on crops: recent issues on Aculus schlechtendali, Calepitrimerus vitis and Aculops lycopersici.

Authors:  C Duso; M Castagnoli; S Simoni; G Angeli
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  The impact of insecticides applied in apple orchards on the predatory mite Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari: Phytoseiidae).

Authors:  Carlo Duso; Shakeel Ahmad; Paola Tirello; Alberto Pozzebon; Virna Klaric; Mario Baldessari; Valeria Malagnini; Gino Angeli
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.132

6.  Evidence for host plant preference by Iphiseiodes quadripilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Citrus.

Authors:  Raul T Villanueva; Carl C Childers
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Intraguild interactions among three spider mite predators: predation preference and effects on juvenile development and oviposition.

Authors:  Hasan Rahmani; Aliakbar Daneshmandi; Andreas Walzer
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.132

8.  Population dynamics of interacting predatory mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus, held on detached bean leaves.

Authors:  A Walzer; S Blümel; P Schausberger
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.132

9.  Predation on heterospecific larvae by adult females of Kampimodromus aberrans, Amblyseius andersoni, Typhlodromus pyri and Phytoseius finitimus (Acari: Phytoseiidae).

Authors:  Shakeel Ahmad; Alberto Pozzebon; Carlo Duso
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.132

10.  Potential of the predatory mite Phytoseius finitimus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to feed and reproduce on greenhouse pests.

Authors:  Maria L Pappas; Christos Xanthis; Konstantinos Samaras; Dimitris S Koveos; George D Broufas
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 2.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.