Literature DB >> 10581649

Effects of glucose and fructose on recently reactivated and recently acquired memories.

W A Rodriguez1, C A Horne, J L Padilla.   

Abstract

1. The effects of glucose and fructose on memory reactivation were investigated. 2. Rats were trained originally on a brightness discrimination passive avoidance task. 3. Memory reactivation treatment consisted of re-exposing the rats 24 hr later to the footshock unconditioned stimulus in the experimental room. Glucose or fructose (32, 100, 320, 1000, or 2000 mg/kg) was administered immediately after reactivation. 4. Twenty-four hr after reactivation (48 hr after training) the rats were tested for their ability to acquire an active avoidance (reversal) task. 5. The dose-response functions for the effects of both glucose and fructose on the reactivated memory followed identical cubic trends. However, a combined dose of glucose and fructose was significantly less effective at modulating memory than was an equimolar dose of either sugar alone. 6. We compared analytically the effects of combined glucose and fructose treatment on new versus old memories. The dose-response functions for both types of memories follow cubic trends, suggesting that similar multiple interacting mechanisms operate when memories are originally stored and when they are later re-encoded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10581649     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-5846(99)00063-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0278-5846            Impact factor:   5.067


  8 in total

Review 1.  Reconsolidation and the Dynamic Nature of Memory.

Authors:  Karim Nader
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Post-retrieval effects of icv infusions of hemicholinium in mice are dependent on the age of the original memory.

Authors:  Mariano M Boccia; Mariano G Blake; Gabriela B Acosta; Carlos M Baratti
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Labile or stable: opposing consequences for memory when reactivated during waking and sleep.

Authors:  Susanne Diekelmann; Christian Büchel; Jan Born; Björn Rasch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Reconsolidation from negative emotional pictures: is successful retrieval required?

Authors:  Bridgid Finn; Henry L Roediger; Emily Rosenzweig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

5.  Reconsolidation: maintaining memory relevance.

Authors:  Jonathan L C Lee
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 6.  Fetal learning about ethanol and later ethanol responsiveness: evidence against "safe" amounts of prenatal exposure.

Authors:  Paula Abate; Mariana Pueta; Norman E Spear; Juan C Molina
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2008-02

7.  Reconsolidation and extinction of conditioned fear: inhibition and potentiation.

Authors:  Jonathan L C Lee; Amy L Milton; Barry J Everitt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  An appetitive experience after fear memory destabilization attenuates fear retention: involvement GluN2B-NMDA receptors in the Basolateral Amygdala Complex.

Authors:  Roque I Ferrer Monti; Marcelo Giachero; Joaquín M Alfei; Adrián M Bueno; Gabriel Cuadra; Victor A Molina
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.460

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.