Literature DB >> 10580785

Varying sensitivity of waist action levels to identify subjects with overweight or obesity in 19 populations of the WHO MONICA Project.

A Molarius1, J C Seidell, S Sans, J Tuomilehto, K Kuulasmaa.   

Abstract

It has been suggested in the literature that cut-off points based on waist circumference (waist action levels) should replace cut-off points based on body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio in identifying subjects with overweight or obesity. In this article, we examine the sensitivity and specificity of the cut-off points when applied to 19 populations with widely different prevalences of overweight. Our design was a cross-sectional study based on random population samples. A total of 32,978 subjects aged 25-64 years from 19 male and 18 female populations participating in the second MONICA survey from 1987 to 1992 were included in this study. We found that at waist action level 1 (waist circumference > or =94 cm in men and > or =80 cm in women), sensitivity varied between 40% and 80% in men and between 51% and 86% in women between populations when compared with the cut-off points based on BMI (> or =25 kg/m2) and waist-to-hip ratio (> or =0.95 for men, > or =0.80 for women). Specificity was high (> or =90%) in all populations. At waist action level 2 (waist circumference > or =102 cm and > or =88 cm in men and women, respectively, BMI > or =30 kg/m2), sensitivity varied from 22% to 64% in men and from 26% to 67% in women, whereas specificity was >95% in all populations. Sensitivity was in general lowest in populations in which overweight was relatively uncommon, whereas it was highest in populations with relatively high prevalence of overweight. We propose that cut-off points based on waist circumference as a replacement for cut-off points based on BMI and waist-to-hip ratio should be viewed with caution. Based on the proposed waist action levels, very few people would unnecessarily be advised to have weight management, but a varying proportion of those who would need it might be missed. The optimal screening cut-off points for waist circumference may be population specific.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10580785     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00114-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  20 in total

Review 1.  Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable.

Authors:  Les Irwig; Patrick Bossuyt; Paul Glasziou; Constantine Gatsonis; Jeroen Lijmer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

2.  What of Asian, African, and South American patients?

Authors:  Suranjith L Seneviratne; Padmalal Gurugama; Devaka J Fernando
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-01-06

3.  High rate of increased carotid intima-media thickness and atherosclerotic plaques in Chinese asymptomatic subjects with central obesity.

Authors:  G T Ko; C C Chow; G Leung; T W Au-Yeung; W B Chan; C S Lam; M Lo; K K Lee
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Study on relation of metabolic syndrome with menopause.

Authors:  Sapna Goyal; Mriganka Baruah; Runi Devi; Kalpana Jain
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-08-03

5.  Association of Body Fat and Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women With Normal Body Mass Index: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Observational Study.

Authors:  Neil M Iyengar; Rhonda Arthur; JoAnn E Manson; Rowan T Chlebowski; Candyce H Kroenke; Lindsay Peterson; Ting-Yuan D Cheng; Elizabeth C Feliciano; Dorothy Lane; Juhua Luo; Rami Nassir; Kathy Pan; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Victor Kamensky; Thomas E Rohan; Andrew J Dannenberg
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 31.777

6.  Effect of physical activity and body size on survival after diagnosis with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A M M Haydon; R J Macinnis; D R English; G G Giles
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Ethnic-specific BMI and waist circumference thresholds.

Authors:  Peter T Katzmarzyk; George A Bray; Frank L Greenway; William D Johnson; Robert L Newton; Eric Ravussin; Donna H Ryan; Claude Bouchard
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Waist circumference and obesity-related abnormalities in French and Cameroonian adults: the role of urbanization and ethnicity.

Authors:  L Fezeu; B Balkau; E Sobngwi; A-P Kengne; S Vol; P Ducimetiere; J-C Mbanya
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  Determination of optimal cut-off values for waist circumferences used for the diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome among Batswana adults (ELS 32).

Authors:  D M Tladi; L Mokgatlhe; S Shaibu; T Nell; R Mitchell; C J Mokgothu; T Gabonthone; O Hubona
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.167

10.  Helicobacter pylori infection is identified as a cardiovascular risk factor in Central Africans.

Authors:  Benjamin Longo-Mbenza; Jacqueline Nkondi Nsenga; Etienne Mokondjimobe; Thierry Gombet; Itoua Ngaporo Assori; Jean Rosaire Ibara; Bertrand Ellenga-Mbolla; Dieudonné Ngoma Vangu; Simon Mbungu Fuele
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2012-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.