Literature DB >> 10580461

Challenges to human subject protections in US medical research.

B Woodward1.   

Abstract

United States regulations governing federally supported research with human subjects derive in part from 2 international codes, the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki. The Declaration of Helsinki states that "concern for the interests of the subject must always prevail over the interests of science and society." The concept of minimal risk and the principle of informed consent are the key means by which US federal regulations seek to protect the rights and welfare of the individual in the research setting. Current trends in medical research-including increased funding, ever-greater capabilities of computers, development of new clinical tools that can also be used in research, and new research tools developed through research itself are creating greater demand for human subjects, for easier recruitment and conscription of these subjects, and for unimpeded access to patient medical records and human biological materials. Nationally and internationally, there are new pressures to subordinate the interests of the subject to those of science and society. The National Bioethics Advisory Commission, which is about to undertake a comprehensive review of the US system of human subject protections, faces a daunting task.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Declaration of Helsinki; Legal Approach; National Bioethics Advisory Commission

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10580461     DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.20.1947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  13 in total

1.  Ethics behind closed doors: do research ethics committees need secrecy?

Authors:  R Ashcroft; N Pfeffer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-26

2.  A new look at international research ethics.

Authors:  S R Benatar; P A Singer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-30

3.  Ethical oversight of public health research: can rules and IRBs make a difference in developing countries?

Authors:  Leslie London
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Ethical issues in molecular medicine of relevance to surgeons.

Authors:  Mark Bernstein; Joseph Bampoe; Abdallah S Daar
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Motivating donors to genetic research? Anthropological reasons to rethink the role of informed consent.

Authors:  Klaus Hoeyer; Niels Lynöe
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006

6.  When is surgery research? Towards an operational definition of human research.

Authors:  C E Margo
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Views of IRBs Concerning their Local Ecologies: Perceptions of Relationships, Systems, and Tensions between IRBs and their Institutions.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2013-01-01

8.  Do research procedures pose relatively greater risk for healthy persons than for persons with schizophrenia?

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Laura B Dunn; Katherine A Green Hammond; Teddy D Warner
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data.

Authors:  Donald J Willison; Karim Keshavjee; Kalpana Nair; Charlie Goldsmith; Anne M Holbrook
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-15

10.  Designing Oversight for Nanomedicine Research in Human Subjects: Systematic Analysis of Exceptional Oversight for Emerging Technologies.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Cortney Jones
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.