OBJECTIVE: To determine the indicators of risk for hospital death, patients undergoing reoperative valve replacement were analyzed METHODS: Four hundred and eighteen consecutive patients undergoing reoperative valve replacement from 1977 to 1994 were reviewed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 11.2% with 9.4% mortality with aortic valve replacement and 14.2% with mitral valve replacement (P=0.52). Mortality was 9.7% for patients less than 70 years of age compared with 19.4% for older patients (P=0.03), and was 8.5% for those with anoxia times less than 90 mins versus 21.9% for those with longer anoxia times (P=0.001). For first reoperations, 9.5% of patients died, while for patients undergoing second or more reoperation, mortality was 23.2% (P=0.01). While mortality increased from 8.9% to 19.0% with the addition of a concomitant procedure (P=0.008), it was not affected if the additional procedure was a coronary bypass (P=0. 96). The indication for surgery influenced outcome. Mortality was zero for thromboembolism, 9% for structural failure, 23% for nonstructural failure and 22% for endocarditis (P=0.006). For New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I patients, mortality was 1.6% compared with 22.3% for those in NYHA class IV (P=0.006). By multivariate analysis, however, only the indication for surgery and the NYHA functional class influenced survival. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative valve surgery can be performed with a survival (88.8%) that is similar to the initial procedure (91.2%). The indication for surgery and NYHA functional class alone influenced outcome; therefore, possible early reoperation is indicated before clinical deterioration occurs.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the indicators of risk for hospital death, patients undergoing reoperative valve replacement were analyzed METHODS: Four hundred and eighteen consecutive patients undergoing reoperative valve replacement from 1977 to 1994 were reviewed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 11.2% with 9.4% mortality with aortic valve replacement and 14.2% with mitral valve replacement (P=0.52). Mortality was 9.7% for patients less than 70 years of age compared with 19.4% for older patients (P=0.03), and was 8.5% for those with anoxia times less than 90 mins versus 21.9% for those with longer anoxia times (P=0.001). For first reoperations, 9.5% of patients died, while for patients undergoing second or more reoperation, mortality was 23.2% (P=0.01). While mortality increased from 8.9% to 19.0% with the addition of a concomitant procedure (P=0.008), it was not affected if the additional procedure was a coronary bypass (P=0. 96). The indication for surgery influenced outcome. Mortality was zero for thromboembolism, 9% for structural failure, 23% for nonstructural failure and 22% for endocarditis (P=0.006). For New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I patients, mortality was 1.6% compared with 22.3% for those in NYHA class IV (P=0.006). By multivariate analysis, however, only the indication for surgery and the NYHA functional class influenced survival. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative valve surgery can be performed with a survival (88.8%) that is similar to the initial procedure (91.2%). The indication for surgery and NYHA functional class alone influenced outcome; therefore, possible early reoperation is indicated before clinical deterioration occurs.
Authors: Jan-Philipp Minol; Payam Akhyari; Udo Boeken; Alexander Albert; Philipp Rellecke; Vanessa Dimitrova; Stephan Urs Sixt; Hiroyuki Kamiya; Artur Lichtenberg Journal: Front Surg Date: 2018-02-09