Literature DB >> 10579244

Is there a preferred technique for weaning the difficult-to-wean patient? A systematic review of the literature.

R Butler1, S P Keenan, K J Inman, W J Sibbald, G Block.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To answer the following question: In difficult-to-wean patients, which of the three commonly used techniques of weaning (T-piece, synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation, or pressure support ventilation) leads to the highest proportion of successfully weaned patients and the shortest weaning time? DATA SOURCES: Computerized literature searches in MEDLINE (1975-1996), Cinahl (1982-1996), and Healthplan (1985-1996), exploding all Mesh headings pertaining to Mechanical Ventilation and Weaning. Searches were restricted to the English language, adults, and humans. Personal files were hand searched, and references of selected articles were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION: a) POPULATION: Patients requiring a gradual weaning process from the ventilator (either requiring prolonged initial ventilation of >72 hrs or a failed trial of spontaneous breathing after >24 hrs of ventilation); b)
INTERVENTIONS: At least two of the following three modes of weaning from mechanical ventilation must have been compared: T-piece, synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation, or pressure support ventilation; c) OUTCOMES: At least one of the following: weaning time (time from initiation of weaning to extubation) or successful weaning rate (successfully off the ventilator for >48 hrs); and d) STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled trial. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently reviewed the articles and graded them according to their methodologic rigor. Data on the success of weaning and the time to wean were summarized for each study. DATA SYNTHESIS: The search strategy identified 667 potentially relevant studies; of these, 228 had weaning as their primary focus, and of these, 48 addressed modes of ventilation during weaning. Only 16 of these 48 studies had one of the specified outcomes, and only ten of these were controlled trials. Of the ten trials, only four fulfilled all our selection criteria. The results of the trials were conflicting, and there was heterogeneity among studies that precluded meaningful pooling of the results.
CONCLUSIONS: There are few trials designed to determine the most effective mode of ventilation for weaning, and more work is required in this area. From the trials reviewed, we could not identify a superior weaning technique among the three most popular modes, T-piece, pressure support ventilation, or synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. However, it appears that synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation may lead to a longer duration of the weaning process than either T-piece or pressure support ventilation. Finally, the manner in which the mode of weaning is applied may have a greater effect on the likelihood of weaning than the mode itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10579244     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199911000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  5 in total

Review 1.  Pressure support versus T-tube for weaning from mechanical ventilation in adults.

Authors:  Magdaline T Ladeira; Flávia M R Vital; Régis B Andriolo; Brenda N G Andriolo; Alvaro N Atallah; Maria S Peccin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-05-27

2.  The development of a novel knowledge-based weaning algorithm using pulmonary parameters: a simulation study.

Authors:  Hasan Guler; Ugur Kilic
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation as a weaning strategy for intubated adults with respiratory failure.

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Maureen O Meade; Azra Premji; Neill K J Adhikari
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-09

Review 4.  Our paper 20 years later: how has withdrawal from mechanical ventilation changed?

Authors:  Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Andrés Esteban
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Comparison of ventilatory modes to facilitate liberation from mechanical ventilation: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kimberley A Lewis; Dipayan Chaudhuri; Gordon Guyatt; Karen E A Burns; Karen Bosma; Long Ge; Tim Karachi; Thomas Piraino; Shannon M Fernando; Nischal Ranganath; Laurent Brochard; Bram Rochwerg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.