Literature DB >> 10578973

Comparative evaluation of seven cell collection devices for cervical smears.

P D Kohlberger1, J Stani, G Gitsch, D G Kieback, G Breitenecker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the most commonly used cervical sampling devices. STUDY
DESIGN: We examined seven cytology sampling devices (Cytobrush, Cervex brush, Szalay spatula, Papex spatula, WrGKK spatula [main social security agency in Vienna], cotton swab and loop). Eight hundred smears were assessed for even distribution of cells, percentage of slide surface covered with cells, and presence and number of endocervical cells.
RESULTS: Even distribution of cells was best with the WrGKK spatula. Percentage of slide surface covered with evaluable cells was best with the Cytobrush. Highest ranking for the presence of endocervical cells was found for the Cytobrush. Cotton swabs and loop showed inferior results in all categories.
CONCLUSION: The use of cervical cell sampling devices showing the best cytologic results improves the interpretation and validity of cervical smears. Our results suggest that cotton swabs and loops should not be used for cervical cell sampling.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10578973     DOI: 10.1159/000331348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cytol        ISSN: 0001-5547            Impact factor:   2.319


  5 in total

1.  [Quality of conventional PAP smears. Quality assessment and motivation for improvement].

Authors:  P Regitnig; A Nader; H Wiener
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  [Cervical cancer screening: past--present--future].

Authors:  G Breitenecker
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Cytohistological correlation of endocervical gland involvement with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  G Kir; Mh Karabulut; Ms Yilmaz; Cs Topal; A Gocmen
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Comparison of the Cervex-Brush® Combi and the Cytobrush+Ayres Spatula Combination for Cervical Sampling in Liquid-Based Cytology.

Authors:  Marcelo Simonsen; José Humberto Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani; Júlio Cesar Possati Resende; Márcio Antoniazzi; Adhemar Longatto-Filho; Cristovam Scapulatempo-Neto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The potential of RNA as a target for national screening of pre-cancer.

Authors:  Frank Karlsen; Margaret Muturi; Cosmas Muyabwa; Lars E Roseng; Serge Bigabwa; Byamungu Chihongola; Lucy Muchiri
Journal:  J Public Health Afr       Date:  2018-12-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.