Literature DB >> 10577886

Mental health benefit limits and cost sharing under managed care: a national survey of employers.

D S Salkever1, J Shinogle, H Goldman.   

Abstract

Mental health services experts suggest that managed care diminishes the need for arbitrary benefit limits and consumer cost-sharing. Data from 577 health plans were used to test the hypotheses that health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and carve-out plans are less likely to use benefit limits or service exclusions, have more generous limits, and have lower cost-sharing requirements than non-HMOs and non-carve-out plans. The results show that HMOs were more likely to use service exclusions and did not make less use of benefit limits. Carve-outs were less likely to use some coverage exclusions. Comparisons of the stringency of limits and cost-sharing provisions did not show consistent differences.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10577886     DOI: 10.1176/ps.50.12.1631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Serv        ISSN: 1075-2730            Impact factor:   3.084


  3 in total

1.  A test of mental health parity: comparisons of outcomes of hospital concurrent utilization review.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Murray; Jeffrey B Henriques
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  The TEFRA medicaid eligibility option for children with severe disabilities: a national study.

Authors:  Rafael M Semansky; Chris Koyanagi
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  A Comparison of Benefit Limits in Mental Health.

Authors:  William Joseph Olesiuk; Helen Anne Sweeney; Eric E Seiber; Hong Zhu; Sharon B Schweikhart; Abigail B Shoben; Kwok Kwan Tam
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.