Literature DB >> 10577436

Racial differences in the management of unstable angina: results from the multicenter GUARANTEE registry.

B M Scirica1, D J Moliterno, N R Every, H V Anderson, F V Aguirre, C B Granger, C T Lambrew, L E Rabbani, S K Sapp, J E Booth, J J Ferguson, C P Cannon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior studies, usually conducted with the use of insurance databases, have shown differences in the use of cardiac procedures between black patients and white patients hospitalized with various types of coronary artery disease. However, few data are available in prospectively collected cohorts of patients with unstable angina or on the use of appropriate medications or interventions. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We evaluated 2948 consecutive patients with unstable angina admitted to 35 hospitals across the United States in 1996, comparing nonwhite and white patients. Seventy-seven percent of patients were white, 14% were black, 4% were Hispanic, 1% were Asian, and 3% were other or unknown race. Differences were seen in coronary risk profile, with a higher incidence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus in nonwhites. Cardiac catheterization was performed less often in nonwhites compared with whites (36% vs 53%, P =.001). Even in patients meeting the criteria for appropriate catheterization in the Agency for Health Care Policy Research unstable angina guidelines, fewer nonwhites underwent catheterization (44% vs 61%, P =.001), but among these, fewer nonwhites had significant coronary stenosis (72% vs 90%, P =.001). However, among patients catheterized who had indications for revascularization, angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting were performed equally often in nonwhites and whites.
CONCLUSIONS: Current guidelines would recommend more aggressive use of cardiac catheterization for nonwhite patients. However, our findings suggest that racial differences may need to be included in the diagnostic and interventional algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10577436     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70071-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  5 in total

1.  Incidence and Predictors of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and the Role of Cardiac Troponin Assays in Patients with Unstable Angina.

Authors:  Sushan Yang; Nirmanmoh Bhatia; Meng Xu; John A McPherson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2019-06-01

2.  "Hot" unstable angina--is it worse than subacute unstable angina? Results from the GUARANTEE Registry.

Authors:  N K Sekaran; D J Moliterno; J J Ferguson; N Every; H V Anderson; F V Aguirre; W J French; S Sapp; J E Booth; C B Granger; C P Cannon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Acute coronary syndromes in black Americans: is treatment different? Should it be?

Authors:  Luther T Clark; Umesh Lingegowda
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Contemporary treatment of heart failure: is there adequate evidence to support a unique strategy for African-Americans? Con position.

Authors:  Keith C Ferdinand; Claudia C Serrano; Daphne P Ferdinand
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Debate: Unstable angina - When should we intervene?

Authors:  Dean J Kereiakes
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.