Literature DB >> 10577435

Very early assessment of risk for in-hospital death among 11,483 patients with acute myocardial infarction. GISSI investigators.

C Fresco1, F Carinci, A P Maggioni, A Ciampi, A Nicolucci, E Santoro, L Tavazzi, G Tognonia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of reperfusion therapy after acute myocardial infarction is time dependent. The risk profile of every patient should be available as soon as possible. Our aim was to determine whether collection of simple clinical markers at hospital admission might allow reliable risk stratification for in-hospital mortality.
METHODS: The subjects were 11,483 patients with acute myocardial infarction from the GISSI-2 cohort. The GISSI-1 and GISSI-3 populations were selected to validate the classification. To stratify patients, the tree-growing method called recursive partitioning and amalgamation (RECPAM) was used. This method is used to identify homogeneous and distinct subgroups with respect to outcome.
RESULTS: The RECPAM algorithm provided 6 classes. RECPAM class I included Killip class 3 to class 4 patients (516 deaths/1000). RECPAM class II included Killip 2 patients older than 66 years and with anterior infarction or sites of infarction that could not be evaluated (314 deaths/1000). Killip 1 patients older than 75 years and with anterior or multiple sites or sites that could not be evaluated were included in RECPAM class III with Killip class 2 patients younger than 66 years and with systolic blood pressure less than 120 mm Hg or older than 66 years and with any other infarction site (207 deaths/1000). The other classes showed lower mortality rates (91, 32, and 12 deaths/1000 for RECPAM classes IV, V, and VI). In the GISSI 1 and GISSI 3 samples the 6 classes ranked in the same order in terms of mortality rate. With respect to low-risk strata, patients belonging to RECPAM class VI without serious clinical events in the first 4 days had a very low incidence of in-hospital death (0.9%) or morbidity. Cumulative 6-month mortality for the 6 RECPAM classes was 59.6%, 41.2%, 26.4%, 12.9%, 4. 8%, and 2.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: Four simple clinical markers readily available at admission of patients with myocardial infarction allow a quick, reliable, and inexpensive prediction of risk for in-hospital and 6-month mortality. The RECPAM classification also helped identify a large subgroup of patients fit for early hospital discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10577435     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70070-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  8 in total

1.  A prospective study of factors influencing the outcome of patients after a Medical Emergency Team review.

Authors:  Paolo Calzavacca; Elisa Licari; Augustine Tee; Moritoki Egi; Michael Haase; Anja Haase-Fielitz; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Improving recognition of patients at risk in a Portuguese general hospital: results from a preliminary study on the early warning score.

Authors:  Nuno Correia; Rui Paulo Rodrigues; Márcia Carvalho Sá; Paula Dias; Luís Lopes; Artur Paiva
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-07-10

3.  Impact of a Local Low-Cost Ward-Based Response System in a Canadian Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Andrea Blotsky; Louay Mardini; Dev Jayaraman
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2016-10-17

4.  Caring for critically ill patients outside intensive care units due to full units: a cohort study.

Authors:  Fabiane Urizzi; Marcos T Tanita; Josiane Festti; Lucienne T Q Cardoso; Tiemi Matsuo; Cintia M C Grion
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  The CADILLAC risk score accurately identifies patients at low risk for in-hospital mortality and adverse cardiovascular events following ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ryan S Wilson; Peter Malamas; Brent Dembo; Sumeet K Lall; Ninad Zaman; Brandon R Peterson
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Automated alert and activation of medical emergency team using early warning score.

Authors:  Soo Jin Na; Ryoung-Eun Ko; Myeong Gyun Ko; Kyeongman Jeon
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2021-12-07

Review 7.  Introduction of a rapid response system: why we are glad we MET.

Authors:  Daryl Jones; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 8.  Bench-to-bedside review: The MET syndrome--the challenges of researching and adopting medical emergency teams.

Authors:  Augustine Tee; Paolo Calzavacca; Elisa Licari; Donna Goldsmith; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 9.097

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.