H M Krumholz1, M J Radford, Y Wang, J Chen, T A Marciniak. 1. Yale University School of Medicine and the Yale-New Haven Hospital, Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Connecticut 06520-8025, USA. harlan.krumholz@yale.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the evidence supporting the importance of early beta-blocker therapy, this intervention has received little attention as an indicator of quality of care. OBJECTIVES: To determine how often beta-blockers are administered as early treatment of acute myocardial infarction in patients 65 years of age or older, to identify predictors of the decision to use beta-blockers, and to evaluate the association between the early use of beta-blockers and in-hospital mortality. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Nongovernment, acute care hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: Medicare beneficiaries who were 65 years of age or older, were hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction in 1994 and 1995, and did not have a contraindication to beta-blocker therapy. MEASUREMENTS: Medical chart review to obtain information about the use of beta-blockers, contraindications to these drugs, patient demographics, and clinical factors. RESULTS: Of the 58 165 patients (from a total of 4414 hospitals), 28 256 (49%) received early beta-blocker therapy. Patients with the highest risk for in-hospital death were the least likely to receive therapy. Patients who received beta-blockers had a lower in-hospital mortality rate than patients who did not receive beta-blockers (odds ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.75 to 0.87]), even after adjustment for baseline differences in demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early beta-blocker therapy was not used for 51% of elderly patients who were hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction and did not have a contraindication to this therapy. Increasing the early use of beta-blockers for these patients would provide an excellent opportunity to improve their care and outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Despite the evidence supporting the importance of early beta-blocker therapy, this intervention has received little attention as an indicator of quality of care. OBJECTIVES: To determine how often beta-blockers are administered as early treatment of acute myocardial infarction in patients 65 years of age or older, to identify predictors of the decision to use beta-blockers, and to evaluate the association between the early use of beta-blockers and in-hospital mortality. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Nongovernment, acute care hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: Medicare beneficiaries who were 65 years of age or older, were hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction in 1994 and 1995, and did not have a contraindication to beta-blocker therapy. MEASUREMENTS: Medical chart review to obtain information about the use of beta-blockers, contraindications to these drugs, patient demographics, and clinical factors. RESULTS: Of the 58 165 patients (from a total of 4414 hospitals), 28 256 (49%) received early beta-blocker therapy. Patients with the highest risk for in-hospital death were the least likely to receive therapy. Patients who received beta-blockers had a lower in-hospital mortality rate than patients who did not receive beta-blockers (odds ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.75 to 0.87]), even after adjustment for baseline differences in demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early beta-blocker therapy was not used for 51% of elderly patients who were hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction and did not have a contraindication to this therapy. Increasing the early use of beta-blockers for these patients would provide an excellent opportunity to improve their care and outcomes.
Authors: Christopher R Carpenter; Kennon Heard; Scott Wilber; Adit A Ginde; Kirk Stiffler; Lowell W Gerson; Neal S Wenger; Douglas K Miller Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Teresita M Hogan; Eve D Losman; Christopher R Carpenter; Karen Sauvigne; Cheryl Irmiter; Linda Emanuel; Rosanne M Leipzig Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Haibo Zhang; Frederick A Masoudi; Jing Li; Qing Wang; Xi Li; John A Spertus; Joseph S Ross; Nihar R Desai; Harlan M Krumholz; Lixin Jiang Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Emily M Bucholz; Neel M Butala; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Yun Wang; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 24.094