Literature DB >> 10576191

Outcome of twin pregnancies according to intrapair birth weight differences.

L M Hollier1, D D McIntire, K J Leveno.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical significance of twin intrapair birth weight differences.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of twin pregnancy outcomes. Intrapair birth weight differences were stratified into the following six groups: 14% or less, 15-20%, 21-25%, 26-30%, 31-40%, and 41% or more using the larger infant as the growth standard. Statistical analysis was done using the Mantel-Haenzel chi2 test.
RESULTS: We studied 1370 consecutive women who delivered at Parkland Hospital, Dallas, Texas, between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 1996, and had twin gestations and live births or fetal deaths within 7 days of delivery. Greater birth weight discordance was significantly associated with preterm delivery due to intervention (P<.001). Noncephalic-cephalic presentations and cesarean delivery were also associated with greater discordance (P = .001 and .02, respectively). Neonatal morbidities, including low birth weight, intensive care admission, and respiratory distress, were all associated with higher birth weight discordance. Fetal abnormalities were more common with increased discordance (P<.001). Greater birth weight discordance was also associated with intrauterine fetal death. There were no differences in outcome for the smaller compared with the larger twin of the twin pair.
CONCLUSION: Twin birth weight discordance is problematic because severe divergent fetal growth increases the risk of fetal death and leads to obstetric intervention and consequent neonatal morbidity due to prematurity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10576191     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00500-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Reappraisal of twinning: epidemiology and outcome in the early neonatal period.

Authors:  P Gupta; M M Faridi; N Goel; Z H Zaidi
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Optimal threshold for birth weight discordance: Does knowledge of chorionicity matter?

Authors:  S Jahanfar; K Lim; E Oviedo-Joekes
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Discordance in neonatal risk factors and early childhood outcomes of very low birth weight (<1.5 kg) twins.

Authors:  K J Steingass; H G Taylor; D Wilson-Costello; N Minich; M Hack
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Degree and rate of growth discordance in dichorionic twins conceived by in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Amira S Egic; Donka V Mojovic; Zagorka M Milovanovic; Aleksandar B Jurisic; Ljubomir P Srbinovic; Suzana P Krsmanovic; Natasa T Karadzov-Orlic
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2014-07-07

5.  Adverse maternal outcomes and birth weight discordance in twin gestation: British Columbia, Canadian data.

Authors:  Shayesteh Jahanfar; Kenneth Lim
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-11-29

6.  Birth weight discordance in very low birth weight twins: mortality, morbidity, and neurodevelopment.

Authors:  Nansi S Boghossian; Shampa Saha; Edward F Bell; Jane E Brumbaugh; Seetha Shankaran; Waldemar A Carlo; Abhik Das
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Intrauterine growth pattern and birthweight discordance in twin pregnancies: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Puccio; Mario Giuffré; Maria Piccione; Ettore Piro; Valentina Malerba; Giovanni Corsello
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.638

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.