Literature DB >> 10573905

Integrality of nasalization and F1. II. Basic sensitivity and phonetic labeling measure distinct sensory and decision-rule interactions.

N A Macmillan1, J Kingston, R Thorburn, L W Dickey, C Bartels.   

Abstract

In vowel perception, nasalization and height (the inverse of the first formant, F1) interact. This paper asks whether the interaction results from a sensory process, decision mechanism, or both. Two experiments used vowels varying in height, degree of nasalization, and three other stimulus parameters: the frequency region of F1, the location of the nasal pole/zero complex relative to F1, and whether a consonant following the vowel was oral or nasal. A fixed-classification experiment, designed to estimate basic sensitivity between stimuli, measured accuracy for discriminating stimuli differing in F1, in nasalization, and on both dimensions. A configuration derived by a multidimensional scaling analysis revealed a perceptual interaction that was stronger for stimuli in which the nasal pole/zero complex was below rather than above the oral pole, and that was present before both nasal and oral consonants. Phonetic identification experiments, designed to measure trading relations between the two dimensions, required listeners to identify height and nasalization in vowels varying in both. Judgments of nasalization depended on F1 as well as on nasalization, whereas judgments of height depended primarily on F1, and on nasalization more when the nasal complex was below than above the oral pole. This pattern was interpreted as a decision-rule interaction that is distinct from the interaction in basic sensitivity. Final consonant nasality had little effect in the classification experiment; in the identification experiment, nasal judgments were more likely when the following consonant was nasal.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573905     DOI: 10.1121/1.428113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Natalya Kaganovich; Courtney Driscoll-Huber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Syllable structure and integration of voicing and manner of articulation information in labial consonant identification.

Authors:  Noah H Silbert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  On the internal perceptual structure of distinctive features: The [voice] contrast.

Authors:  John Kingston; Randy L Diehl; Cecilia J Kirk; Wendy A Castleman
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2008-01-01

4.  Perceptual dimensions influence auditory category learning.

Authors:  Casey L Roark; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Auditory categories with separable decision boundaries are learned faster with full feedback than with minimal feedback.

Authors:  Han Gyol Yi; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Resonance Effects and the Vocalization of Speech.

Authors:  Brad Rakerd; Eric J Hunter; Peter Lapine
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2019-12-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.