Literature DB >> 10573896

Memory for pitch versus memory for loudness.

S Clément1, L Demany, C Semal.   

Abstract

The decays of pitch traces and loudness traces in short-term auditory memory were compared in forced-choice discrimination experiments. The two stimuli presented on each trial were separated by a variable delay (D); they consisted of pure tones, series of resolved harmonics, or series of unresolved harmonics mixed with lowpass noise. A roving procedure was employed in order to minimize the influence of context coding. During an initial phase of each experiment, frequency and intensity discrimination thresholds [P(C) = 0.80] were measured with an adaptive staircase method while D was fixed at 0.5 s. The corresponding physical differences (in cents or dB) were then constantly presented at four values of D: 0.5, 2, 5, and 10 s. In the case of intensity discrimination, performance (d') markedly decreased when D increased from 0.5 to 2 s, but was not further reduced when D was longer. In the case of frequency discrimination, the decline of performance as a function of D was significantly less abrupt. This divergence suggests that pitch and loudness are processed in separate modules of auditory memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573896     DOI: 10.1121/1.428106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Perceptual grouping affects pitch judgments across time and frequency.

Authors:  Elizabeth M O Borchert; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Monkey׳s short-term auditory memory nearly abolished by combined removal of the rostral superior temporal gyrus and rhinal cortices.

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Megan Malloy; Mortimer Mishkin; Richard C Saunders
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain.

Authors:  B R Postle
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Modelling neural informational propagation and functional auditory sensory memory with temporal multi-scale operators.

Authors:  Maja Serman; Nikola Serman; Niall J L Griffith
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Formation and decay of auditory short-term memory in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Tobias Teichert; Kate Gurnsey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Time-dependent discrimination advantages for harmonic sounds suggest efficient coding for memory.

Authors:  Malinda J McPherson; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Relative salience of spectral and temporal features in auditory long-term memory.

Authors:  Pingbo Yin; Shihab A Shamma; Jonathan B Fritz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  An evaluation of psychophysical models of auditory change perception.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Christian Kaernbach; Laurent Demany
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 9.  Music perception, pitch, and the auditory system.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Effect of acoustic similarity on short-term auditory memory in the monkey.

Authors:  Brian H Scott; Mortimer Mishkin; Pingbo Yin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.