Literature DB >> 10573668

Tennis elbow, natural course and relationship with physical activities: an inquiry among physicians.

J M Mens1, R Stoeckart, C J Snijders, J A Verhaar, H J Stam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The main purposes of the study were to answer the following two questions: is a restrictive therapeutic management in case of tennis elbow (TE) better or worse than a regular therapeutic approach and do racket sports and other physical activities influence the risk to get TE and to what extent.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study by means of a postal questionnaire. The impression was verified that physicians are reserved about medical interventions when treating themselves for tennis elbow. The frequency of therapeutic measures and their results were compared with data reported in literature. Physical activities of physicians who had TE were compared with those of physicians who never had TE.
SETTING: Physicians who attended postgraduate courses on diagnosis and treatment in orthopedic medicine from 1984 to 1992. PARTICIPANT: 72 physicians who had TE and 266 with no history of TE. MEASURE: The study is based on self-assessment of therapeutic approaches and their results, reported physical activities at the onset of TE and at the moment of the inquiry. By a team of experts the grade of grasping and/or dorsiflexion of the physical activities was classified.
RESULTS: Compared with patients in general practice, physicians treating themselves for TE were more restrictive to use NSAID's, ointments or local steroid injections or to consult a specialist. No-one was treated with surgery and no-one interrupted her/his work because of TE. In all but two of the 72 cases the TE resolved within two years. The odds ratio for TE for playing racket sports versus not playing racket sports was 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.64-4.82). The odds ratio for activities with low-grade grasping and/or dorsiflexion versus "no sports or hobbies" was 0.11 (0.02-0.50).
CONCLUSIONS: Absence from work and therapeutic measures for TE are (in physicians) not necessary for a good result on the long term. Playing racket sports increases the risk to get TE by a factor of 2.8. Performing weekly activities with low grade grasping and/or dorsiflexion of the wrist may have a protective effect against developing tennis elbow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness        ISSN: 0022-4707            Impact factor:   1.637


  3 in total

1.  Impairment assessment of lateral epicondylitis through electromyography and dynamometry.

Authors:  Marc-André Blanchette; Martin C Normand
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2011-06

2.  Vocation and avocation: leisure activities correlate with professional engagement, but not burnout, in a cross-sectional survey of UK doctors.

Authors:  I C McManus; Hallgeir Jonvik; Peter Richards; Elisabeth Paice
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of treatment response of lateral epicondylitis of the elbow.

Authors:  Anette Savnik; Bente Jensen; Jesper Nørregaard; Niels Egund; Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe; Henning Bliddal
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.