Literature DB >> 10573345

Outcome of ultrasonographic hip abnormalities in clinically stable hips.

D J Sucato1, C E Johnston, J G Birch, J A Herring, P Mack.   

Abstract

A retrospective review was performed of 192 newborn hips in 112 patients referred for hip evaluation. The average age at presentation was 12.7 days, with average radiographic follow-up of 15.9 months. Inclusion criteria for our study were a normal physical examination of the hip without evidence of instability and an ultrasound examination that was considered abnormal. Pavlik harness treatment was chosen at the discretion of the treating physician. At final follow-up, dysplasia was defined as greater than two standard deviations above the mean acetabular index (AI) for age. Group I consisted of 43 hips that had Pavlik treatment, and group II consisted of 149 hips that did not receive treatment. There was no difference in these two groups with respect to risk factors for dysplasia or the initial abnormalities seen on ultrasound evaluation, although patients in group I had less coverage of the femoral head during stress maneuvers. No hip in group I and two (1.3%) hips in group II were considered dysplastic (AI > 2 SD) at final radiographic follow-up (p > 0.10). There was no correlation between the severity of the ultrasound abnormality at birth and the subsequent presence of dysplasia (p > 0.10). The two hips considered dysplastic on radiograph were not being actively treated. When the hip examination of a newborn hip younger than 1 month is normal, a screening ultrasound does not appear to predict accurately subsequent hip dysplasia. In this specific setting, an initial screening ultrasound may be too sensitive and does not appear warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  9 in total

1.  Clinical examination versus ultrasonography in detecting developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  H Dogruel; H Atalar; O Y Yavuz; U Sayli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The use of X-ray at 5 months in a selective screening programme for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Kathryn R Price; Rosemary Dove; James B Hunter
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 3.  Splinting for the non-operative management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in children under six months of age.

Authors:  Kerry Dwan; Jamie Kirkham; Robin W Paton; Emma Morley; Ashley William Newton; Daniel C Perry
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-10-10

4.  Performance, treatment pathways, and effects of alternative policy options for screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  C Dezateux; J Brown; R Arthur; J Karnon; A Parnaby
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 5.  Late acetabular dysplasia after successful treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip using the Pavlik method: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  K Aaron Shaw; Colleen M Moreland; Dana Olszewski; Tim Schrader
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-12-04

6.  Discrepancy between sonographic and radiographic values after ultrasound-monitored treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Sandra Utzschneider; Claudia Chita; Alexander C Paulus; Christian Guenther; Volkmar Jansson; Bernhard Heimkes
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  The most relevant diagnostic criteria for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a study of British specialists.

Authors:  Daniel Williams; Evangelia Protopapa; Kuldeep Stohr; James B Hunter; Andreas Roposch
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Active monitoring versus immediate abduction as treatment of stable developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Evy M B Paulussen; Frederike E C M Mulder; Nina M C Mathijssen; M Adhiambo Witlox
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 9.  The epidemiology and demographics of hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Randall T Loder; Elaine N Skopelja
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2011-10-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.